Similar articles

• [Foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol for labour induction].

  Panelius E, Heikinheimo O, Rahkonen L. Panelius E, et al. Duodecim. 2012;128(20):2093-102. Duodecim. 2012. PMID: 23167168 Finnish.
• Induction of labour at term with oral misoprostol versus a Foley catheter (PROBAAT-II): a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.

  Ten Eikelder ML, Oude Rengerink K, Jozwiak M, de Leeuw JW, de Graaf IM, van Pampus MG, Holswilder M, Oudijk MA, van Baaren GJ, Pernet PJ, Bax C, van Unnik GA, Martens G, Porath M, van Vliet H, Rijnders RJ, Feitsma AH, Roumen FJ, van Loon AJ, Versendaal H, Weinans MJ, Woiski M, van Beek E, Hermsen B, Mol BW, Bloemenkamp KW. Ten Eikelder ML, et al. Lancet. 2016 Apr 16;387(10028):1619-28. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00084-2. Epub 2016 Feb 3. Lancet. 2016. PMID: 26850983 Clinical Trial.
• Labour induction at term--a randomised trial comparing Foley catheter plus titrated oral misoprostol solution, titrated oral misoprostol solution alone, and dinoprostone.

  Matonhodze BB, Hofmeyr GJ, Levin J. Matonhodze BB, et al. S Afr Med J. 2003 May;93(5):375-9. S Afr Med J. 2003. PMID: 12830603 Clinical Trial.
• Intracervical Foley balloon catheter for cervical ripening and labor induction: A review.

  Greenberg V, Khalifeh A. Greenberg V, et al. Semin Perinatol. 2015 Oct;39(6):441-3. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2015.07.005. Epub 2015 Aug 31. Semin Perinatol. 2015. PMID: 26338441 Review.
• Outpatient cervical ripening.

  Amorosa JM, Stone JL. Amorosa JM, et al. Semin Perinatol. 2015 Oct;39(6):488-94. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2015.07.014. Epub 2015 Sep 11. Semin Perinatol. 2015. PMID: 26365009 Review.