Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jun:103:106-116.
doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.01.019. Epub 2016 Feb 2.

Comparing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation with conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

Comparing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation with conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A meta-analysis

Su Jin Kim et al. Resuscitation. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: The objective was to determine whether extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), when compared with conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR), improves outcomes in adult patients, and to determine appropriate conditions that can predict good survival outcome in ECPR patients through a meta-analysis.

Methods: We searched the relevant literature of comparative studies between ECPR and CCPR in adults, from the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. The baseline information and outcome data (survival, good neurologic outcome at discharge, at 3-6 months, and at 1 year after arrest) were extracted. Beneficial effect of ECPR on outcome was analyzed according to time interval, location of arrest (out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA)), and pre-defined population inclusion criteria (witnessed arrest, initial shockable rhythm, cardiac etiology of arrest and CPR duration) by using Review Manager 5.3. Cochran's Q test and I(2) were calculated.

Results: 10 of 1583 publications were included. Although survival to discharge did not show clear superiority in OHCA, ECPR showed statistically improved survival and good neurologic outcome as compared to CCPR, especially at 3-6 months after arrest. In the subgroup of patients with pre-defined inclusion criteria, the pooled meta-analysis found similar results in studies with pre-defined criteria.

Conclusion: Survival and good neurologic outcome tended to be superior in the ECPR group at 3-6 months after arrest. The effect of ECPR on survival to discharge in OHCA was not clearly shown. As ECPR showed better outcomes than CCPR in studies with pre-defined criteria, strict indications criteria should be considered when implementation of ECPR.

Keywords: Cerebral performance category; Conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation; In-hospital cardiac arrest; Meta-analysis; Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • ECPR: Are we ready for primetime?
    Ocegueda-Pacheco C, Varon J. Ocegueda-Pacheco C, et al. Resuscitation. 2016 Jun;103:A6-A7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.02.022. Epub 2016 Mar 3. Resuscitation. 2016. PMID: 26948822 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources