Variation of mandibular sexual dimorphism across human facial patterns
- PMID: 26852041
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jchb.2015.11.004
Variation of mandibular sexual dimorphism across human facial patterns
Abstract
This study analysed how sex-specific features differed in male and female adult mandibles throughout the spectrum of vertical facial patterns (i.e., meso-, dolicho- and brachyfacial) and sagittal variations (the so-called skeletal Classes I, II and III; normal maxillo-mandibular relationship, maxillary prognathism vs. mandibular retrognathism, and maxillary retrognathism vs. mandibular prognathism, respectively). Specifically, we test the hypothesis that sexual dimorphism in the mandible is independent of such facial vertical and sagittal patterns. A sample of 187 European adults (92 males, 95 females; age range, 20-30 years; mean age 25.6 years, sd=4.2 years) from Granada (southern Spain) were randomly selected and grouped according to the standard cephalometric criteria of the sagittal and vertical patterns. Geometric morphometrics were used to analyse the size (centroid size) and shape (principal components analysis, mean shape comparisons) of the mandible. The patterns of sexual dimorphism were evaluated with a generalised linear model with interaction term. We found that sagittal and vertical facial patterns are associated with different mandibular morphologies (size and shape). Also, sexual dimorphism was present in all comparisons. The hypothesis was rejected only for vertical facial patterns. That is, the nature of sexual dimorphism was similar among the skeletal classes but different (e.g., distribution of dimorphic variables, interaction term) in meso-, dolicho-, and brachyfacial mandibles. In conclusion, sex-specific mandibular traits behave in a different way across vertical facial patterns. These results imply that an assessment of the vertical facial pattern of the individual is required before a sexual diagnosis of the mandible is proposed.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Morphological integration of mandible and cranium: orthodontic implications.Arch Oral Biol. 2014 Jan;59(1):22-9. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2013.10.005. Epub 2013 Oct 19. Arch Oral Biol. 2014. PMID: 24192112
-
Is it possible to use cross-sectional and vertical facial measurements to establish the shape of the mandibular arch?J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014 Nov 1;15(6):735-9. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1608. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014. PMID: 25825099
-
Craniofacial characteristics in the sagittal dimension: A cephalometric study in Lebanese young adults.Int Orthod. 2017 Mar;15(1):114-130. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2016.12.001. Epub 2017 Jan 5. Int Orthod. 2017. PMID: 28065707
-
The mandibular muscles in contemporary orthodontic practice: a review.Aust Dent J. 2017 Mar;62 Suppl 1:78-85. doi: 10.1111/adj.12481. Aust Dent J. 2017. PMID: 28297090 Review.
-
Improving Male Chin and Mandible Eesthetics.Clin Plast Surg. 2022 Apr;49(2):275-283. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2021.12.004. Clin Plast Surg. 2022. PMID: 35367034 Review.
Cited by
-
Mechanisms Underlying Sex Differences in Temporomandibular Disorders and Their Comorbidity with Migraine.Brain Sci. 2024 Jul 15;14(7):707. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14070707. Brain Sci. 2024. PMID: 39061447 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Which one closes extraction spaces faster: en masse retraction or two-step retraction? A randomized prospective clinical trial.Angle Orthod. 2019 Nov;89(6):855-861. doi: 10.2319/101618-748.1. Epub 2019 Jul 1. Angle Orthod. 2019. PMID: 31259616 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Mandibular morphology and the Mesolithic-Neolithic transition in Westernmost Iberia.Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 3;13(1):16648. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42846-z. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37789074 Free PMC article.
-
Sexual dimorphisms in three-dimensional masticatory muscle attachment morphometry regulates temporomandibular joint mechanics.J Biomech. 2021 Sep 20;126:110623. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110623. Epub 2021 Jul 10. J Biomech. 2021. PMID: 34311291 Free PMC article.
-
Mandibular shape prediction using cephalometric analysis: applications in craniofacial analysis, forensic anthropology and archaeological reconstruction.Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Oct 31;42(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s40902-020-00282-3. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020. PMID: 33296053 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources