Comparison of Outcomes of Patients With Sepsis With Versus Without Acute Myocardial Infarction and Comparison of Invasive Versus Noninvasive Management of the Patients With Infarction
- PMID: 26853952
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.12.050
Comparison of Outcomes of Patients With Sepsis With Versus Without Acute Myocardial Infarction and Comparison of Invasive Versus Noninvasive Management of the Patients With Infarction
Abstract
Patients hospitalized with sepsis may be predisposed to acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The incidence, treatment, and outcomes of AMI in sepsis have not been studied. We analyzed data from the National Inpatient Sample from 2002 to 2011 for patients with a diagnosis of sepsis. The incidence of AMI as a nonprimary diagnosis was evaluated. Propensity score matching was used to identify a cohort of patients with secondary AMI and sepsis with similar baseline characteristics who were managed invasively (defined as cardiac catheterization, percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI], or coronary artery bypass graft [CABG] surgery) or conservatively. The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality. A total of 2,602,854 patients had a diagnosis of sepsis. AMI was diagnosed in 118,183 patients (4.5%), the majority with non-ST elevation AMI (71.4%). In-hospital mortality was higher in patients with AMI and sepsis than those with sepsis alone (35.8% vs 16.8%, p <0.0001; adjusted odds ratio 1.24, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.26). In patients with AMI, 11,899 patients (10.1%) underwent an invasive management strategy, in which 4,668 patients (39.2%) underwent revascularization. PCI was performed in 3,413 patients (73.1%), CABG in 1,165 (25.0%), and both CABG and PCI in 90 patients (1.9%). In a propensity-matched cohort of 23,708 patients with AMI, invasive management was associated with a lower mortality than conservative management (19.0% vs 33.4%, p <0.001; odds ratio 0.47, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.50). In subgroups that underwent revascularization, the odds of mortality were consistently lower than corresponding matched subjects from the conservative group. In conclusion, myocardial infarction not infrequently complicates sepsis and is associated with a significant increase in in-hospital mortality. Patients managed invasively had a lower mortality than those managed conservatively.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Management and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction in patients with chronic kidney disease.Int J Cardiol. 2017 Jan 15;227:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.026. Epub 2016 Nov 9. Int J Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 27846456
-
Influence of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Seropositive Status on the In-Hospital Management and Outcomes of Patients Presenting With Acute Myocardial Infarction.J Invasive Cardiol. 2016 Oct;28(10):403-409. J Invasive Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 27705890
-
Differential time trends of outcomes and costs of care for acute myocardial infarction hospitalizations by ST elevation and type of intervention in the United States, 2001-2011.J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Mar 23;4(3):e001445. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001445. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015. PMID: 25801759 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction Hospitalizations With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: An Analysis of Nationwide Readmissions Database.Curr Probl Cardiol. 2022 Nov;47(11):101086. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2021.101086. Epub 2021 Dec 20. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2022. PMID: 34936910 Review.
-
Reduced rate of revascularization in schizophrenic patients with acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 20;99:109870. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.109870. Epub 2020 Jan 16. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2020. PMID: 31954758
Cited by
-
Machine learning for predicting acute myocardial infarction in patients with sepsis.Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 24;14(1):30629. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80575-z. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39719483 Free PMC article.
-
Occurrence and Impact of Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events during Sepsis: A 15-Year Observational Study.Emerg Med Int. 2020 Sep 27;2020:9685604. doi: 10.1155/2020/9685604. eCollection 2020. Emerg Med Int. 2020. PMID: 33062335 Free PMC article.
-
Troponin I Cutoff for Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Sepsis.Mediators Inflamm. 2022 May 27;2022:5331474. doi: 10.1155/2022/5331474. eCollection 2022. Mediators Inflamm. 2022. PMID: 35677736 Free PMC article.
-
Post-Infectious Myocardial Infarction: Does Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Improve Outcomes? A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.J Clin Med. 2020 May 26;9(6):1608. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061608. J Clin Med. 2020. PMID: 32466424 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond the Beat: A Multifaceted Review of Atrial Fibrillation in Sepsis: Risk Factors, Management Strategies, and Economic Impact.Cardiol Res. 2025 Feb;16(1):1-14. doi: 10.14740/cr1723. Epub 2024 Dec 31. Cardiol Res. 2025. PMID: 39897439 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous