Are insect repellents toxic to freshwater insects? A case study using caddisflies exposed to DEET
- PMID: 26855222
- DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.01.098
Are insect repellents toxic to freshwater insects? A case study using caddisflies exposed to DEET
Abstract
Stream ecosystems face ever-increasing pressures by the presence of emergent contaminants, such as, personal care products. N, N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (DEET) is a synthetic insect repellent that is being found in surface waters environments in concentrations up to 33.4 μg/L. Information concerning DEET's toxicity in the aquatic environment is still limited and focused only on its acute effects on model species. Our main objective was to assess the effects of DEET exposure to a caddisfly non-target species using sub-lethal endpoints. For that, we chose Sericostoma vittatum, an important shredder in Portuguese freshwaters that has been already used in different ecotoxicological assays. Besides acute tests, S. vittatum were exposed during 6 days to a gradient of DEET concentrations (8, 18 and 40.5 mg/L) to assess effects on feeding behaviour and biochemical responses, such as, lipid peroxidation levels (LPO), catalase and acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activities, and also assess effects on energy reserves and consumption. Acute tests revealed a 48 h-LC50 of 80.12 mg/L and DEET exposure caused feeding inhibition with a LOEC of 36.80 mg/L. Concerning the biochemical responses, DEET caused no effects in LPO nor on catalase activity. A non-significant decrease in AChE activity was observed. Regarding energetic reserves, exposure to DEET caused a significant reduction in S. vittatum carbohydrates levels. These results add important information for the risk assessment of insect repellents in the aquatic environment and suggest that reported environmental concentrations of DEET are not toxic to non-target freshwater insects.
Keywords: Biomarkers; Energy reserves; Feeding behaviour; Freshwater insects; N,N-Diethyl-3-methylbenzamide; Sericostoma vittatum.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Responses of the aquatic midge Chironomus riparius to DEET exposure.Aquat Toxicol. 2016 Mar;172:80-5. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2015.12.020. Epub 2016 Jan 4. Aquat Toxicol. 2016. PMID: 26773354
-
Energetic costs and biochemical biomarkers associated with esfenvalerate exposure in Sericostoma vittatum.Chemosphere. 2017 Dec;189:445-453. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.09.057. Epub 2017 Sep 13. Chemosphere. 2017. PMID: 28957762
-
Ecotoxicity of two organic UV-filters to the freshwater caddisfly Sericostoma vittatum.Environ Pollut. 2017 Sep;228:370-377. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.05.021. Epub 2017 May 26. Environ Pollut. 2017. PMID: 28554026
-
Environmental release, environmental concentrations, and ecological risk of N,N-Diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET).Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2012 Jan;8(1):135-66. doi: 10.1002/ieam.271. Epub 2011 Nov 4. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2012. PMID: 21913321 Review.
-
Assessment of the environmental fate and ecotoxicity of N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET).Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2012 Jan;8(1):120-34. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1246. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2012. PMID: 22006575 Review.
Cited by
-
Ozone/graphene oxide catalytic oxidation: a novel method to degrade emerging organic contaminant N, N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET).Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 11;6:31405. doi: 10.1038/srep31405. Sci Rep. 2016. PMID: 27510858 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources