Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016;21(1):38-56.
doi: 10.18666/LDMJ-2016-V21-I1-6971.

Evidence-Based Reading and Writing Assessment for Dyslexia in Adolescents and Young Adults

Affiliations

Evidence-Based Reading and Writing Assessment for Dyslexia in Adolescents and Young Adults

Kathleen Nielsen et al. Learn Disabil (Pittsbg). 2016.

Abstract

The same working memory and reading and writing achievement phenotypes (behavioral markers of genetic variants) validated in prior research with younger children and older adults in a multi-generational family genetics study of dyslexia were used to study 81 adolescent and young adults (ages 16 to 25) from that study. Dyslexia is impaired word reading and spelling skills below the population mean and ability to use oral language to express thinking. These working memory predictor measures were given and used to predict reading and writing achievement: Coding (storing and processing) heard and spoken words (phonological coding), read and written words (orthographic coding), base words and affixes (morphological coding), and accumulating words over time (syntax coding); Cross-Code Integration (phonological loop for linking phonological name and orthographic letter codes and orthographic loop for linking orthographic letter codes and finger sequencing codes), and Supervisory Attention (focused and switching attention and self-monitoring during written word finding). Multiple regressions showed that most predictors explained individual difference in at least one reading or writing outcome, but which predictors explained unique variance beyond shared variance depended on outcome. ANOVAs confirmed that research-supported criteria for dyslexia validated for younger children and their parents could be used to diagnose which adolescents and young adults did (n=31) or did not (n=50) meet research criteria for dyslexia. Findings are discussed in reference to the heterogeneity of phenotypes (behavioral markers of genetic variables) and their application to assessment for accommodations and ongoing instruction for adolescents and young adults with dyslexia.

Keywords: adolescents and young adults; developmental dyslexia; family genetics studies; predictor working memory components; word decoding and reading outcomes; word spelling outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alosco M, Fedor A, Gunstad J. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder as a risk factor for concussions in NCAA division-I athletes. Brain Injury. 2014:1–3. doi:10 .3109/02699052.2014.887145. - PubMed
    1. Anastasiou D, Protopapas A. Difficulties in lexical stress versus difficulties in segmental phonology among adolescents with dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading. 2015;19:31–50. doi:10.1080/10888438. 2014.934452.
    1. Astrom R, Wadsworth S, Olson F, Willicutt E, DeFries J. Genetic and environmental etiologies of reading difficulties: DeFries-Fulker analysis of reading performance data from twin pairs and their non-twin pair siblings. Learning and Individual Differences. 2012;22:365–369. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif,2012.01.011. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Atkinson TS, Zhang GL, Zeller N, Phillips SF. Using word study instruction with developmental college students. Journal of Research In Reading. 2014;37:433–448. doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.12015.
    1. Baddeley A, Gathercole S, Papagno C. The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review. 1998;105:158–173. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources