Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015;68(4):434-8.
doi: 10.5173/ceju.2015.604. Epub 2015 Nov 2.

Intrarenal pressure and irrigation flow with commonly used ureteric access sheaths and instruments

Anna Wright  1 , Kevin Williams  1 , Bhaskar Somani  2 , Nicholas Rukin  1
Affiliations

Intrarenal pressure and irrigation flow with commonly used ureteric access sheaths and instruments

Anna Wright et al. Cent European J Urol. 2015.

Abstract

Introduction: Flexible ureterorenoscopy is becoming a first-line treatment for many intrarenal stones. Ureteric access sheaths are commonly used to aid access, stone removal and reduce intrarenal pressure. We evaluated the effects of two commonly used access sheaths on irrigation flow and intrarenal pressure during flexible ureterorenoscopy. We measured the effect of scope instrumentation on flow and pressure.

Material and methods: We utilized a 10/12F and 12/14F, 35 cm Re-Trace™ access sheath with a FlexX2 scope in a cadaveric porcine kidney. We evaluated the effect of four Nitinol baskets (1.3F, 1.5F, 1.9F, 2.2F), three different 200 µm laser fibres and a hand-held pump. Measurements of irrigation flow and intrarenal pressure were recorded and compared between the different sized access sheaths.

Results: Flow rates varied widely between access sheaths. Without instrumentation, mean flow was 17 mls/min (10/12F access sheath), versus 33 mls/min (12/14F sheath) (p <0.0001). Increasing basket size produced a gradual reduction in flow and pressure in both access sheaths. Reassuringly, pressures were low overall (<40 cm H2O). Pressures were significantly reduced when using the larger 12/14F sheath, with and without all instrumentations (p <0.0001). Hand-held pump devices have a marked effect on flow and pressure in both sheaths; with pressures rising up to 121 cm H2O with a 10/12F sheath, versus 29 cm H2O (12/14F) (p <0.0001).

Conclusions: A 12/14F access sheath offered significantly improved irrigation whilst maintaining significantly lower intrarenal pressure, when compared to a 10/12F access sheath in a cadaveric porcine model. Scope instrumentation affects irrigation flow and pressure in both sized sheaths. Furthermore, there should be caution with hand-held pump devices, especially with smaller sized sheaths, as intrarenal pressure can be very high.

Keywords: access sheaths; flow; laser fibres; nitinol baskets; pressure; ureterorenoscopy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
In vitro fresh cadaveric porcine kidney model with access sheath and pressure transducer.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Turk C, Knoll T, Petrik A. Guidelines on Urolithiasis European Association of Urology. 2014.
    1. Al-Qahtani SM, Gil-Deiz-de-Medina S, Traxer O. Predictors of clinical outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy with holmium laser for renal stone greater than 2 cm. Advances in urology. 2012 doi: 10.1155/2012/543537. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aboumarzouk OM, Monga M, Kata SG, Traxer O, Somani BK. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stones >2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol. 2012;26:1257–1263. - PubMed
    1. Bromwich EJ, Lockyer R, Keoghane SR. Day-case rigid and flexible ureteroscopy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007;89:526–528. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Newman RC, Hunter PT, Hawkins IF, Finlayson B. A general ureteral dilator-sheathing system. Urology. 1985;25:287–288. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources