Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Feb;5(1):47-54.
doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.06.08.

Implant-based breast reconstruction following conservative mastectomy: one-stage vs. two-stage approach

Affiliations
Review

Implant-based breast reconstruction following conservative mastectomy: one-stage vs. two-stage approach

Maurice Y Nahabedian. Gland Surg. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Conservative mastectomy with preservation of the nipple areolar complex is now considered a safe and effective technique in properly selected patients. Good candidates for this procedure include women with small to moderate breast volume having therapeutic or prophylactic mastectomy. Both autologous and prosthetic options are available; however prosthetic techniques are performed more frequently. Prosthetic approaches include immediate 1-stage (direct to implant) or 2-atge (tissue expander/implant) techniques. Delayed prosthetic reconstruction is also possible with conservative mastectomy. This manuscript will review the 1-stage and 2-stage methods with an emphasis on indication, surgical techniques, and outcomes.

Keywords: Breast reconstruction; breast implants; conservative mastectomy; nipple sparing mastectomy; tissue expanders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: Dr. MY Nahabedian is a consultant for LifeCell, Allergan, and Sientra.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preoperative photograph of a patient with left breast cancer scheduled for unilateral conservative mastectomy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Intraoperative photograph of the lateral and periareolar incision with a 300 cc permanent implant and acellular dermal matrix.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Preoperative photograph following permanent implant placement. The plan is for right augmentation with a 100 cc device and exchange of the left implant for a 350 cc device.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Postoperative photograph demonstrating excellent volume and contour symmetry at 1 year follow-up.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Preoperative photograph of a patient scheduled for bilateral risk reduction conservative mastectomy.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Early postoperative photograph following bilateral breast reconstruction with tissue expanders.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Preoperative photograph with fully inflated tissue expanders.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Postoperative photograph with bilateral 400 cc silicone gel implants demonstrating excellent volume and contour symmetry.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Right lateral view demonstrating excellent contour.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Left lateral view demonstrating excellent contour.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Preoperative photograph of a woman following right conservative mastectomy scheduled for delayed 2-stage prosthetic reconstruction.
Figure 12
Figure 12
The lateral and infra-areolar incisions are opened and the tissue expander and acellular dermal matrix are placed.
Figure 13
Figure 13
Preoperative photograph demonstrating an over inflated tissue expander scheduled for exchange and contralateral augmentation for symmetry.
Figure 14
Figure 14
Postoperative photograph demonstrating excellent volume and contour symmetry at 6 months follow-up.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Spear SL, Willey SC, Feldman ED, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for prophylactic and therapeutic indications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;128:1005-14. - PubMed
    1. Endara M, Chen D, Verma K, et al. Breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: a systematic review of the literature with pooled analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;132:1043-54. - PubMed
    1. Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ, et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. Breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;131:15-23. - PubMed
    1. Cemal Y, Albornoz CR, Disa JJ, et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: Part 2. The influence of changing mastectomy patterns on reconstructive rate and method. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;131:320e-6e. - PubMed
    1. Salzberg CA, Ashikari AY, Koch RM, et al. An 8-year experience of direct-to-implant immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm). Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127:514-24. - PubMed