Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2016 Sep;31(7):817-24.
doi: 10.1093/heapol/czv137. Epub 2016 Feb 7.

Inequality and inequity in healthcare utilization in urban Nepal: a cross-sectional observational study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Inequality and inequity in healthcare utilization in urban Nepal: a cross-sectional observational study

Eiko Saito et al. Health Policy Plan. 2016 Sep.

Abstract

Inequality in access to quality healthcare is a major health policy challenge in many low- and middle-income countries. This study aimed to identify the major sources of inequity in healthcare utilization using a population-based household survey from urban Nepal. A cross-sectional survey was conducted covering 9177 individuals residing in 1997 households in five municipalities of Kathmandu valley between 2011 and 2012. The concentration index was calculated and a decomposition method was used to measure inequality in healthcare utilization, along with a horizontal inequity index (HI) to estimate socioeconomic inequalities in healthcare utilization. Results showed a significant pro-rich distribution of general healthcare utilization in all service providers (Concentration Index: 0.062, P < 0.001; HI: 0.029, P < 0.05) and private service providers (Concentration Index: 0.070, P < 0.001; HI: 0.030, P < 0.05). The pro-rich distribution of probability in general healthcare utilization was attributable to inequalities in the level of household economic status (percentage contribution: 67.8%) and in the self-reported prevalence of non-communicable diseases such as hypertension (36.7%) and diabetes (14.4%). Despite the provision of free services by public healthcare providers, our analysis found no evidence of the poor making more use of public health services (Concentration Index: 0.041, P = 0.094). Interventions to reduce the household economic burden of major illnesses, coupled with improvement in the management of public health facilities, warrant further attention by policy-makers.

Keywords: : Health economics; health care utilization; health inequalities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Concentration curves for probability of healthcare use by type of providers, Nepal, 2011-2012.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Contributions of need, non-need and consumption factors to concentration index for probability of healthcare use, by types of healthcare providers used, Nepal, 2011–2012.

References

    1. Ahmed SM, Tomson G, Petzold M, Kabir ZN. 2005. Socioeconomic status overrides age and gender in determining health-seeking behaviour in rural Bangladesh. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 83: 109–117. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bago d’Uva T, Jones AM, Van Doorslaer E. 2009. Measurement of horizontal inequity in health care utilisation using European panel data. Journal of Health Economics 28: 280–289. - PubMed
    1. Basu S, Andrews J, Kishore S, Panjabi R, Stuckler D. 2012. Comparative performance of private and public healthcare systems in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. PLoS Medicine 9: e1001244. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Belay T, Tandon A. 2011. Assessing fiscal space for health in Nepal. Heath, nutrition and population discussion paper. Washington, DC: World Bank; http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2011/07/16240700/assessing-fis..., accessed 25 July 2012.
    1. Bonfrer I, Van De Poel E, Grimm M, Van Doorslaer E. 2014. Does the distribution of healthcare utilization match needs in Africa? Health Policy and Planning 29: 921–937. - PubMed

Publication types