Ex vivo virotherapy with myxoma virus does not impair hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells
- PMID: 26857235
- PMCID: PMC4748395
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2015.12.007
Ex vivo virotherapy with myxoma virus does not impair hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells
Abstract
Background: Relapsing disease is a major challenge after hematopoietic cell transplantation for hematological malignancies. Myxoma virus (MYXV) is an oncolytic virus that can target and eliminate contaminating cancer cells from auto-transplant grafts. The aims of this study were to examine the impact of MYXV on normal hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and define the optimal treatment conditions for ex vivo virotherapy.
Methods: Bone marrow (BM) and mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (mPBSCs) from patients with hematologic malignancies were treated with MYXV at various time, temperature and incubation media conditions. Treated BM cells from healthy normal donors were evaluated using flow cytometry for MYXV infection, long-term culture-initiating cell (LTC-IC) assay and colony-forming cell (CFC) assay.
Results: MYXV initiated infection in up to 45% of antigen-presenting monocytes, B cells and natural killer cells; however, these infections were uniformly aborted in >95% of all cells. Fresh graft sources showed higher levels of MYXV infection initiation than cryopreserved specimens, but in all cases less than 10% of CD34(+) cells could be infected after ex vivo MYXV treatment. MYXV did not impair LTC-IC colony numbers compared with mock treatment. CFC colony types and numbers were also not impaired by MYXV treatment. MYXV incubation time, temperature or culture media did not significantly change the percentage of infected cells, LTC-IC colony formation or CFC colony formation.
Conclusions: Human hematopoietic cells are non-permissive for MYXV. Human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells were not infected and thus unaffected by MYXV ex vivo treatment.
Keywords: bone marrow; mobilized peripheral stem cell blood; myxoma virus; purging; virotherapy.
Copyright © 2015 International Society for Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures




















Similar articles
-
Acute myeloid leukemia targeting by myxoma virus in vivo depends on cell binding but not permissiveness to infection in vitro.Leuk Res. 2012 May;36(5):619-24. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2012.01.020. Epub 2012 Feb 17. Leuk Res. 2012. PMID: 22341701 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term hematopoietic culture-initiating cells are more abundant in mobilized peripheral blood grafts than in bone marrow but have a more limited ex vivo expansion potential.Blood Cells Mol Dis. 1996;22(1):68-81. doi: 10.1006/bcmd.1996.0010. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 1996. PMID: 8807087
-
Transplantation of autologous bone marrow pre-loaded ex vivo with oncolytic myxoma virus is efficacious against drug-resistant Vk*MYC mouse myeloma.Oncotarget. 2022 Mar 3;13:490-504. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.28205. eCollection 2022. Oncotarget. 2022. PMID: 35251496 Free PMC article.
-
Oncolytic viral purging of leukemic hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells with Myxoma virus.Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2010 Apr-Jun;21(2-3):169-75. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2010.02.010. Epub 2010 Mar 7. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2010. PMID: 20211576 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ex-vivo purging of hematopoietic progenitor cells.Curr Hematol Rep. 2004 Jul;3(4):257-64. Curr Hematol Rep. 2004. PMID: 15217555 Review.
Cited by
-
Ex Vivo Oncolytic Virotherapy with Myxoma Virus Arms Multiple Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplant Leukocytes to Enhance Graft versus Tumor.Mol Ther Oncolytics. 2016 Dec 14;4:31-40. doi: 10.1016/j.omto.2016.12.002. eCollection 2017 Mar 17. Mol Ther Oncolytics. 2016. PMID: 28345022 Free PMC article.
-
Therapeutics for Graft-versus-Host Disease: From Conventional Therapies to Novel Virotherapeutic Strategies.Viruses. 2016 Mar 22;8(3):85. doi: 10.3390/v8030085. Viruses. 2016. PMID: 27011200 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comprehensive and translational pathobiology of COVID-19 based on cellular and molecular techniques.Pract Lab Med. 2025 Aug 11;46:e00497. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2025.e00497. eCollection 2025 Sep. Pract Lab Med. 2025. PMID: 40895261 Free PMC article. Review.
-
How stem cells respond to infection, inflammation and ageing.Nat Rev Immunol. 2025 Jul 24. doi: 10.1038/s41577-025-01203-z. Online ahead of print. Nat Rev Immunol. 2025. PMID: 40707693 Review.
-
Antiviral resistance of stem cells.Curr Opin Immunol. 2019 Feb;56:50-59. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Oct 20. Curr Opin Immunol. 2019. PMID: 30352329 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Gribben JG, Nadler LM. Bone marrow purging for autologous bone marrow transplantation. Leuk Lymphoma. 1993;11(Suppl 2):141–148. - PubMed
-
- Kvalheim G. Purging of autografts: methods and clinical significance. Ann Med. 1996;28(2):167–173. - PubMed
-
- Yang H, Eaves C, de Lima MLM, et al. A novel triple purge strategy for eliminating chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) cells from autografts. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2006;37(6):575–582. - PubMed
-
- Vellenga E, van Putten W, Ossenkoppele GJ, et al. Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2011;118(23):6037–6042. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical