The long-term effects of a randomized trial comparing aerobic interval versus continuous training in coronary artery disease patients: 1-year data from the SAINTEX-CAD study
- PMID: 26858279
- DOI: 10.1177/2047487316631200
The long-term effects of a randomized trial comparing aerobic interval versus continuous training in coronary artery disease patients: 1-year data from the SAINTEX-CAD study
Abstract
Background: Aerobic interval training (AIT) and aerobic continuous training (ACT) both improve physical fitness (peak VO2) in coronary artery disease patients. However, little is known about the long-term effects of AIT and ACT on peak VO2 and exercise adherence.
Design: This study is a randomized clinical multicenter trial.
Methods: In total, 163 patients were assessed after 12 weeks of AIT or ACT and 12 months after their enrollment. Physical fitness and physical activity measures served as the primary outcomes, and peripheral endothelial function, cardiovascular risk factors and quality of life (QoL) served as the secondary outcomes.
Results: Twenty-six patients dropped out during the intervention; 11 were lost during the follow-up period. Dropouts (n = 37) consisted of more women (p = 0.001) compared to completers (n = 163). Physical fitness (VO2, heart rate and workload at peak and at thresholds) and physical activity (steps, active energy expenditure [kcal], physical activity duration [minutes]) were preserved at the 1-year follow-up (p-time > 0.05) after both AIT and ACT (p-interaction > 0.05). Forty percent of patients showed increased peak VO2, 52% showed increased active energy expenditure and 91.2% met the recommended levels of 150 minutes/week of moderate physical activity (p-group > 0.05). Further, peripheral endothelial function, QoL and cardiovascular risk factors, except systolic blood pressure (p-time < 0.05), remained stable (p-time > 0.05) after both AIT and ACT (p-interaction > 0.05).
Conclusion: The short-term improvements of center-based AIT and ACT on physical fitness, physical activity, peripheral endothelial function, cardiovascular risk factors and QoL are sustained after a 1-year follow-up period. The majority of patients (>90%) met the recommended physical activity levels of 150 minutes/week.
Keywords: Long-term follow-up; coronary artery disease; exercise adherence; interval training; physical activity.
© The European Society of Cardiology 2016.
Comment in
-
How to keep on going: Editorial comment on The long-term effects of a randomized trial comparing aerobic interval versus continuous training in coronary artery disease patients: one-year data from the SAINTEX-CAD study.Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Jul;23(11):1151-3. doi: 10.1177/2047487316642368. Epub 2016 Apr 14. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 27081165 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Aerobic interval training and continuous training equally improve aerobic exercise capacity in patients with coronary artery disease: the SAINTEX-CAD study.Int J Cardiol. 2015 Jan 20;179:203-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.10.155. Epub 2014 Oct 25. Int J Cardiol. 2015. PMID: 25464446 Clinical Trial.
-
Rationale and design of a randomized trial on the effectiveness of aerobic interval training in patients with coronary artery disease: the SAINTEX-CAD study.Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 9;168(4):3532-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.05.007. Epub 2013 May 24. Int J Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 23711446 Clinical Trial.
-
Are aerobic interval training and continuous training isocaloric in coronary artery disease patients?Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Sep;23(14):1486-95. doi: 10.1177/2047487316645468. Epub 2016 Apr 20. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 27099395
-
High-intensity Interval Training Dosage for Heart Failure and Coronary Artery Disease Cardiac Rehabilitation. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2019 Mar;72(3):233-243. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2018.02.015. Epub 2018 Apr 9. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2019. PMID: 29650445 English, Spanish.
-
Interval training versus continuous exercise in patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.Heart Lung Circ. 2015 Feb;24(2):149-57. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2014.09.001. Epub 2014 Sep 16. Heart Lung Circ. 2015. PMID: 25306500 Review.
Cited by
-
Interventions to promote patient utilisation of cardiac rehabilitation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Feb 1;2(2):CD007131. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007131.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 30706942 Free PMC article.
-
Home-Based Rehabilitation With Telemonitoring Guidance for Patients With Coronary Artery Disease (Short-Term Results of the TRiCH Study): Randomized Controlled Trial.J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 22;20(6):e225. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9943. J Med Internet Res. 2018. PMID: 29934286 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of high-intensity interval training on cardiopulmonary function and quality of life in post-PCI or CABG patients with coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis.J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 Jul 16;20(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s13019-025-03543-2. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025. PMID: 40671125 Free PMC article.
-
Amount or intensity? Potential targets of exercise interventions in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.ESC Heart Fail. 2018 Feb;5(1):53-62. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12227. Epub 2017 Dec 6. ESC Heart Fail. 2018. PMID: 29210202 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Exercise Training and Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Comprehensive Assessment and Prescription.J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 27;14(5):1607. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051607. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40095584 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous