Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb 9;133(6):601-9.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.017719.

Introduction to the Analysis of Survival Data in the Presence of Competing Risks

Peter C Austin  1 , Douglas S Lee  2 , Jason P Fine  2
Affiliations

Introduction to the Analysis of Survival Data in the Presence of Competing Risks

Peter C Austin et al. Circulation. .

Abstract

Competing risks occur frequently in the analysis of survival data. A competing risk is an event whose occurrence precludes the occurrence of the primary event of interest. In a study examining time to death attributable to cardiovascular causes, death attributable to noncardiovascular causes is a competing risk. When estimating the crude incidence of outcomes, analysts should use the cumulative incidence function, rather than the complement of the Kaplan-Meier survival function. The use of the Kaplan-Meier survival function results in estimates of incidence that are biased upward, regardless of whether the competing events are independent of one another. When fitting regression models in the presence of competing risks, researchers can choose from 2 different families of models: modeling the effect of covariates on the cause-specific hazard of the outcome or modeling the effect of covariates on the cumulative incidence function. The former allows one to estimate the effect of the covariates on the rate of occurrence of the outcome in those subjects who are currently event free. The latter allows one to estimate the effect of covariates on the absolute risk of the outcome over time. The former family of models may be better suited for addressing etiologic questions, whereas the latter model may be better suited for estimating a patient's clinical prognosis. We illustrate the application of these methods by examining cause-specific mortality in patients hospitalized with heart failure. Statistical software code in both R and SAS is provided.

Keywords: cumulative incidence function; data interpretation, statistical; incidence; models, statistical; proportional hazards models; risk assessment; survival analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Cumulative incidence functions. CIF indicates cumulative incidence function; and KM, Kaplan–Meier.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Cumulative incidence functions and Kaplan–Meier estimates. CIF indicates cumulative incidence function; and KM, Kaplan–Meier.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL. The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. 2nd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons; 2002.
    1. Cox D. Regression models and life tables (with discussion). J Roy Stat Soc - Series B. 1972;34:187–220.
    1. Cox D, Oakes D. Analysis of Survival Data. London, UK: Chapman & Hall; 1984.
    1. Therneau TM, Grambsch PM. Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2000.
    1. Klein JP, Moeschberger ML. Survival Analysis: Techniques for Censored and Truncated Data. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1997.

Publication types