Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jan 26:6:2004.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02004. eCollection 2015.

Understanding the P×S Aspect of Within-Person Variation: A Variance Partitioning Approach

Affiliations
Review

Understanding the P×S Aspect of Within-Person Variation: A Variance Partitioning Approach

Brian Lakey. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

This article reviews a variance partitioning approach to within-person variation based on Generalizability Theory and the Social Relations Model. The approach conceptualizes an important part of within-person variation as Person × Situation (P×S) interactions: differences among persons in their profiles of responses across the same situations. The approach provided the first quantitative method for capturing within-person variation and demonstrated very large P×S effects for a wide range of constructs. These include anxiety, five-factor personality traits, perceived social support, leadership, and task performance. Although P×S effects are commonly very large, conceptual, and analytic obstacles have thwarted consistent progress. For example, how does one develop a psychological, versus purely statistical, understanding of P×S effects? How does one forecast future behavior when the criterion is a P×S effect? How can understanding P×S effects contribute to psychological theory? This review describes potential solutions to these and other problems developed in the course of conducting research on the P×S aspect of social support. Additional problems that need resolution are identified.

Keywords: G theory; Person × Situation; P×S; RRT; SRM; within-person variation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
P×S profiles from Table 1. Each of three persons is indicated by P1 – P3 and each of three situations is indicated by S1 – S3.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
P×S profiles of supportiveness (PSS) covary with P×S profiles of positive affect (PA). Each of three persons is indicated by P1 – P3 and each of three situations is indicated by S1 – S3.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
P×S effects emerge when persons weigh providers’ traits differently in forming support judgments. N = neuroticism; E = extroversion; O = openness; A = agreeableness; C = conscientiousness.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ackerman R. A., Kashy D. A., Corretti C. A. (2015). A tutorial on analyzing data from speed-dating studies with heterosexual dyads. Pers. Relationsh. 22 92–110. 10.1111/pere.12065 - DOI
    1. Avolio B. J., Walumbwa F. O., Weber T. J. (2009). Leadership: current theories, research, and future directions. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 60 421–449. 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163621 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Back M. D., Kenny D. A. (2010). The Social Relations Model: how to understand dyadic processes. Soc. Pers. Psychol. Compass 4 855–870. 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00303.x - DOI
    1. Barrera M., Jr (1986). Distinctions between social support concepts, measures and models. Am. J. Community Psychol. 14 413–445. 10.1007/BF00922627 - DOI
    1. Barry R., Lakey B., Orehek E. (2007). Links among attachment dimensions, affect and the self for broadly-generalized attachment styles and relationship-specific bonds. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 33 240–253. 10.1177/0146167206296102 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources