Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan 27:3:285.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00285. eCollection 2015.

Measuring the Mental Health-Care System Responsiveness: Results of an Outpatient Survey in Tehran

Affiliations

Measuring the Mental Health-Care System Responsiveness: Results of an Outpatient Survey in Tehran

Setareh Forouzan et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

As explained by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2000, the concept of health system responsiveness is one of the core goals of health systems. Since 2000, further efforts have been made to measure health system responsiveness and the factors affecting responsiveness, yet few studies have applied responsiveness concepts to the evaluation of mental health systems. The present study aims to measure responsiveness and its related domains in the mental health-care system of Tehran. Utilizing the same method used by the WHO for its responsiveness survey, responsiveness for outpatient mental health care was evaluated using a validated Farsi questionnaire. A sample of 500 public mental health service users in Tehran participated and subsequently completed the questionnaire. On average, 47% of participants reported experiencing poor responsiveness. Among responsiveness domains, confidentiality and dignity were the best performing factors while autonomy, access to care, and quality of basic amenities were the worst performing. Respondents who reported their social status as low were more likely to experience poor responsiveness overall. Attention and access to care were responsiveness dimensions that performed poorly but were considered to be highly important by study participants. In summary, the study suggests that measuring responsiveness could provide guidance for further development of mental health-care systems to become more patient orientated and provide patients with more respect.

Keywords: Iran; mental health care; outpatient; responsiveness; social status.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percentage of participants rating responsiveness domains.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Responsiveness by domains in relation to domain importance.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gostin L, Hodge JG, Valentine N, Nygren-Krug H. The Domains of Health Responsiveness – A Human Rights Analysis. Geneva: World Health Organization; (2003).
    1. Jones AM, Rice N, Robone S, Dias PR. Inequality and polarisation in health systems’ responsiveness: a cross-country analysis. J Health Econ (2011) 30(4):616–25.10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.05.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murray CJ, Frenk J. A framework for assessing the performance of health systems. Bull World Health Organ (2000) 78(6):717–31. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Darby C, Valentine N, Murray CJ, De Silva A. World Health Organization (WHO): Strategy on Measuring Responsiveness. World Health Organization; (2000).
    1. Bramesfeld A, Klippel U, Seidel G, Schwartz FW, Dierks ML. How do patients expect the mental health service system to act? Testing the WHO responsiveness concept for its appropriateness in mental health care. Soc Sci Med (2007) 65(5):880–9.10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.056 - DOI - PubMed