Efficacy, safety, tolerability and population pharmacokinetics of tedizolid, a novel antibiotic, in Latino patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections
- PMID: 26859064
- PMCID: PMC9427544
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bjid.2015.12.007
Efficacy, safety, tolerability and population pharmacokinetics of tedizolid, a novel antibiotic, in Latino patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections
Abstract
Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections are caused mainly by Gram-positive bacteria which are often treated with intravenous vancomycin, daptomycin, or linezolid, with potential step down to oral linezolid for outpatients. Tedizolid phosphate 200mg once daily treatment for six days demonstrated non-inferior efficacy, with a favourable safety profile, compared with linezolid 600mg twice daily treatment for 10 days in the Phase 3 ESTABLISH-1 and -2 trials. The objective of the current post-hoc analysis of the integrated dataset of ESTABLISH-1 and -2 was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tedizolid (N=182) vs linezolid (N=171) in patients of Latino origin enrolled into these trials. The baseline demographic characteristics of Latino patients were similar between the two treatment groups. Tedizolid demonstrated comparable efficacy to linezolid at 48-72h in the intent-to-treat population (tedizolid: 80.2% vs linezolid: 81.9%). Sustained clinical success rates were comparable between tedizolid- and linezolid-treated Latino patients at end-of-therapy (tedizolid: 86.8% vs linezolid: 88.9%). Tedizolid phosphate treatment was well tolerated by Latino patients in the safety population with lower abnormal platelet counts at end-of-therapy (tedizolid: 3.4% vs linezolid: 11.3%, p=0.0120) and lower incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events (tedizolid: 16.5% vs linezolid: 23.5%). Population pharmacokinetic analysis suggested that estimated tedizolid exposure measures in Latino patients vs non-Latino patients were similar. These findings demonstrate that tedizolid phosphate 200mg, once daily treatment for six days was efficacious and well tolerated by patients of Latino origin, without warranting dose adjustment.
Keywords: ABSSSI; Latino ethnicity; Oxazolidinone; Tedizolid.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Efficacy and Safety of Tedizolid Phosphate versus Linezolid in a Randomized Phase 3 Trial in Patients with Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Jun 24;63(7):e02252-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02252-18. Print 2019 Jul. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019. PMID: 30988146 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Tedizolid: a novel oxazolidinone with potent activity against multidrug-resistant gram-positive pathogens.Drugs. 2015 Feb;75(3):253-70. doi: 10.1007/s40265-015-0352-7. Drugs. 2015. PMID: 25673021 Review.
-
Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of tedizolid versus linezolid in patients with skin and soft tissue infections in Japan - Results of a randomised, multicentre phase 3 study.J Infect Chemother. 2018 Jun;24(6):434-442. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2018.01.010. Epub 2018 Mar 9. J Infect Chemother. 2018. PMID: 29530544 Clinical Trial.
-
Tedizolid phosphate vs linezolid for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: the ESTABLISH-1 randomized trial.JAMA. 2013 Feb 13;309(6):559-69. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.241. JAMA. 2013. PMID: 23403680 Clinical Trial.
-
Pharmacokinetic drug evaluation of tedizolid for the treatment of skin infections.Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2017 Mar;13(3):331-337. doi: 10.1080/17425255.2017.1290080. Epub 2017 Feb 16. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2017. PMID: 28140693 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Safety Evaluation of Contezolid (MRX-I) Versus Linezolid in Sprague-Dawley Rats.Drugs R D. 2025 Jun;25(2):127-140. doi: 10.1007/s40268-025-00504-x. Epub 2025 May 13. Drugs R D. 2025. PMID: 40360967 Free PMC article.
-
In vitro susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from skin and soft tissue infections to vancomycin, daptomycin, linezolid and tedizolid.Braz J Infect Dis. 2017 Sep-Oct;21(5):493-499. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2017.03.010. Epub 2017 Apr 19. Braz J Infect Dis. 2017. PMID: 28432878 Free PMC article.
-
Tedizolid phosphate for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections: an evidence-based review of its place in therapy.Core Evid. 2019 Jul 5;14:31-40. doi: 10.2147/CE.S187499. eCollection 2019. Core Evid. 2019. PMID: 31308835 Free PMC article.
-
Critical role of tedizolid in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections.Drug Des Devel Ther. 2016 Dec 22;11:65-82. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S84667. eCollection 2017. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2016. PMID: 28053508 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Efficacy and Safety of Tedizolid Phosphate versus Linezolid in a Randomized Phase 3 Trial in Patients with Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Jun 24;63(7):e02252-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02252-18. Print 2019 Jul. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019. PMID: 30988146 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Dryden M. Complicated skin and soft tissue infection. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65(Suppl. 3):iii35–iii44. - PubMed
-
- Qualls M.L., Mooney M.M., Camargo C.A., Jr., Zucconi T., Hooper D.C., Pallin D.J. Emergency department visit rates for abscess versus other skin infections during the emergence of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 1997–2007. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55:103–105. - PubMed
-
- Gould I.M., David M.Z., Esposito S., Garau J., Lina G., Mazzei T. New insights into meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) pathogenesis, treatment and resistance. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2012;39:96–104. - PubMed
-
- Guzmán-Blanco M., Mejía C., Isturiz R., Alvarez C., Bavestrello L., Gotuzzo E., et al. Epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Latin America. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009;34:304–308. - PubMed
-
- Mejía C., Zurita J., Guzmán-Blanco M. Epidemiology and surveillance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Latin America. Braz J Infect Dis. 2010;14(Suppl. 2):S79–S86. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical