Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2017 Apr;26(4):311-314.
doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000370.

A Comparison of Sequential Glaucoma Drainage Device Implantation Versus Cyclophotocoagulation Following Failure of a Primary Drainage Device

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A Comparison of Sequential Glaucoma Drainage Device Implantation Versus Cyclophotocoagulation Following Failure of a Primary Drainage Device

Joshua D Levinson et al. J Glaucoma. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare sequential glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation with transscleral diode cyclophotocoagulation (CPC) following failure of a primary GDD.

Materials and methods: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent GDD implantation at a single institution over 10 years. Patients who required an additional GDD and/or CPC were analyzed. Success was defined as absence of loss of light perception, reoperation for glaucoma, and intraocular pressure (IOP) >21 or <6 at 2 consecutive visits after an initial 3-month period.

Results: Thirty-two patients received sequential GDD. Twenty-one underwent CPC. Cohorts were statistically similar in regards to age, sex, race, and number of previous surgeries. Preoperatively, the GDD cohort had a lower IOP and better visual acuity. The mean length of follow-up was 37.9 months for the GDD group and 46.3 months for CPC. Both procedures significantly reduced IOP; however, CPC led to a greater reduction (P=0.0172). Survival analysis found the 5-year probability of surgical success to be 65.3% for sequential GDD and 58.0% for CPC (P=0.8678). No cases of phthisis occurred in either group. There were 2 cases of endophthalmitis (6.3%) in the GDD group, and none in the CPC group. In eyes without preexisting corneal edema, estimated corneal decompensation probability at 3 years was 31.6% for GDD and 6.7% for CPC (P=0.0828).

Conclusions: Sequential GDD and CPC are both effective at reducing IOP following the failure of a primary GDD. CPC after GDD failure warrants further investigation as it led to a greater reduction in IOP with fewer serious adverse events.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan-Meier survival curve: Sequential GDD versus CPC.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier survival curve. Corneal survival following Sequential GDD versus CPC

References

    1. Ramulu PY, Corcoran KJ, Corcoran SL, et al. Utilization of various glaucoma surgeries and procedures in Medicare beneficiaries from 1995 to 2004. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:2265–2270. - PubMed
    1. Gedde SJ, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ, et al. Treatment outcomes in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) study after five years of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153:789–803. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Christakis PG, Tsai JC, Kalenak JW, et al. The Ahmed versus Baerveldt study: three-year treatment outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:2232–2240. - PubMed
    1. Sood S, Beck AD. Cyclophotocoagulation versus sequential tube shunt as a secondary intervention following primary tube shunt failure in pediatric glaucoma. J AAPOS. 2009;13:379–383. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mistlberger A, Liebmann JM, Tschiderer H, et al. Diode laser transscleral cyclophotocoagulation for refractory glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2001;10:288–293. - PubMed

Publication types