Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Feb 9;11(2):e0148415.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148415. eCollection 2016.

Exploring the Mechanisms of a Patient-Centred Assessment with a Solution Focused Approach (DIALOG+) in the Community Treatment of Patients with Psychosis: A Process Evaluation within a Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial

Serif Omer  1 , Eoin Golden  1 , Stefan Priebe  1
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Exploring the Mechanisms of a Patient-Centred Assessment with a Solution Focused Approach (DIALOG+) in the Community Treatment of Patients with Psychosis: A Process Evaluation within a Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial

Serif Omer et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: DIALOG+ is a new intervention to make routine community mental health meetings therapeutically effective. It involves a structured assessment of patient concerns and a solution-focused approach to address them. In a randomised controlled trial, DIALOG+ was associated with better subjective quality of life and other outcomes in patients with psychosis, but it was not clear how this was achieved. This study explored the possible mechanisms.

Methods: This was a mixed-methods process evaluation within a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Focus groups and interviews were conducted with patients and clinicians who experienced DIALOG+ and were analysed using thematic analysis. The content of DIALOG+ sessions was recorded and analysed according to (i) the type of actions agreed during sessions and (ii) the domains discussed. The subjective quality of life measure was analysed with mixed-effects models to explore whether the effect of DIALOG+ was limited to life domains that had been addressed in sessions or consistent across all domains.

Results: Four qualitative themes emerged regarding the mechanisms of DIALOG+: (1) a comprehensive structure; (2) self-reflection; (3) therapeutic self-expression; and (4) empowerment. Patients took responsibility for the majority of actions agreed during sessions (65%). The treatment effect on subjective quality of life was largest for living situation (accommodation and people that the patient lives with) and mental health. Two of these domains were among the three most commonly discussed in DIALOG+ sessions (accommodation, mental health, and physical health).

Conclusion: DIALOG+ initiates positive, domain-specific change in the areas that are addressed in sessions. It provides a comprehensive and solution-focused structure to routine meetings, encourages self-reflection and expression, and empowers patients. Future research should strengthen and monitor these factors.

Trial registration: ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN34757603.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. CONSORT flowchart.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Bridle D, McCabe R, Priebe S. Incorporating psychotherapeutic methods in routine community treatment for patients with psychotic disorders. Psychosis. 2013;5(2): 154–165.
    1. Priebe S, McCabe R. The therapeutic relationship in psychiatric settings. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 2006;113(429): 69–72. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00721.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gilbody SM, House AO, Sheldon TA. Routinely administered questionnaires for depression and anxiety: systematic review. BMJ. 2001;322(7283): 406–409. 10.1136/bmj.322.7283.406 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Slade M, McCrone P, Kuipers E, Leese M, Cahill S, Parabiaghi A, et al. Use of standardised outcome measures in adult mental health services: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2006;189(4): 330–336. 10.1192/bjp.bp.105.015412 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Os J, Altamura AC, Bobes J, Gerlach J, Hellewell JSE, Kasper S, et al. Evaluation of the Two-Way Communication Checklist as a clinical intervention: results of a multinational, randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2004;184(1): 79–83. 10.1192/03-329 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data