Intravenous/oral ciprofloxacin therapy versus intravenous ceftazidime therapy for selected bacterial infections
- PMID: 2686417
- DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90051-x
Intravenous/oral ciprofloxacin therapy versus intravenous ceftazidime therapy for selected bacterial infections
Abstract
The efficacy and toxicity of sequential intravenous and oral ciprofloxacin therapy was compared with intravenously administered ceftazidime in a prospective, randomized, controlled, non-blinded trial. Thirty-two patients (16 patients receiving ciprofloxacin and 16 patients receiving ceftazidime) with 38 infections caused by susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa, enteric gram-negative rods, Salmonella group B, Serratia marcescens, Pseudomonas cepacia, and Xanthomonas maltophilia at various sites were evaluable for determination of efficacy. Length of therapy varied from seven to 25 days. Concomitant antimicrobials included intravenously administered beta-lactams for gram-positive organisms, intravenous/oral metronidazole and clindamycin for anaerobes, and intravenous/local amphotericin B for Candida albicans. Intravenous administration of 200 mg ciprofloxacin every 12 hours to 11 patients produced peak serum levels between 1.15 and 3.12 micrograms/ml; trough levels ranged between 0.08 and 0.86 micrograms/ml. Overall response rates were similar for patients receiving ciprofloxacin and ceftazidime. Emergence of resistance was similar in both groups--one Enterobacter cloacae and two P. aeruginosa became resistant after ciprofloxacin therapy and two P. aeruginosa became resistant after ceftazidime therapy. The frequency of superinfection with a variety of organisms was also similar in both groups. Adverse events related to ciprofloxacin included transient pruritus at the infusion site and generalized rash leading to drug discontinuation (one patient each), and with ceftazidime adverse effects included pain at the site of infusion and the development of allergic interstitial nephritis (one patient each). Overall, intravenous/oral ciprofloxin therapy appears to be as safe and effective as intravenous ceftazidime therapy in the treatment of a variety of infections due to susceptible aerobic gram-negative organisms.
Similar articles
-
Prospective, randomized comparison of sequential intravenous followed by oral ciprofloxacin with intravenous ceftazidime in the treatment of serious infections.Am J Med. 1989 Nov 30;87(5A):185S-190S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90055-7. Am J Med. 1989. PMID: 2686421 Clinical Trial.
-
Intravenous/oral ciprofloxacin versus ceftazidime in the treatment of serious infections.Am J Med. 1989 Nov 30;87(5A):164S-168S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90050-8. Am J Med. 1989. PMID: 2589361 Clinical Trial.
-
Ciprofloxacin (intravenous/oral) versus ceftazidime in lower respiratory tract infections.Am J Med. 1989 Nov 30;87(5A):113S-115S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90036-3. Am J Med. 1989. PMID: 2686410 Clinical Trial.
-
Safety of intravenous ciprofloxacin. A review.Am J Med. 1989 Nov 30;87(5A):92S-97S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90032-6. Am J Med. 1989. PMID: 2686431 Review.
-
Ceftobiprole: a review of a broad-spectrum and anti-MRSA cephalosporin.Am J Clin Dermatol. 2008;9(4):245-54. doi: 10.2165/00128071-200809040-00004. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2008. PMID: 18572975 Review.
Cited by
-
Do we need an intravenous fluoroquinolone?West J Med. 1992 Jul;157(1):55-9. West J Med. 1992. PMID: 1413744 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sequential antibiotic therapy: Effective cost management and patient care.Can J Infect Dis. 1995 Nov;6(6):306-15. doi: 10.1155/1995/165848. Can J Infect Dis. 1995. PMID: 22550411 Free PMC article.
-
Modes of administration of antibiotics for symptomatic severe urinary tract infections.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;2007(4):CD003237. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003237.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007. PMID: 17943784 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical