The Recognition of STEMI by Paramedics and the Effect of Computer inTerpretation (RESPECT): a randomised crossover feasibility study
- PMID: 26864325
- DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2015-204988
The Recognition of STEMI by Paramedics and the Effect of Computer inTerpretation (RESPECT): a randomised crossover feasibility study
Abstract
Background: The appropriate management of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) depends on accurate interpretation of the 12-lead ECG by paramedics. Computer interpretation messages on ECGs are often provided, but the effect they exert on paramedics' decision-making is not known. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of using an online assessment tool, and collect pilot data, for a definitive trial to determine the effect of computer interpretation messages on paramedics' diagnosis of STEMI.
Methods: The Recognition of STEMI by Paramedics and the Effect of Computer inTerpretation (RESPECT) feasibility study was a randomised crossover trial using a bespoke, web-based assessment tool. Participants were randomly allocated 12 of 48 ECGs, with an equal mix of correct and incorrect computer interpretation messages, and STEMI and STEMI-mimics. The nature of the responses required a cross-classified multi-level model.
Results: 254 paramedics consented into the study, 205 completing the first phase and 150 completing phase two. The adjusted OR for a correct paramedic interpretation, when the computer interpretation was correct (true positive for STEMI or true negative for STEMI-mimic), was 1.80 (95% CI 0.84 to 4.91) and 0.58 (95% CI 0.41 to 0.81) when the computer interpretation was incorrect (false positive for STEMI or false negative for STEMI-mimic). The intraclass correlation coefficient for correct computer interpretations was 0.33 for participants and 0.17 for ECGs, and for incorrect computer interpretations, 0.06 for participants and 0.01 for ECGs.
Conclusions: Determining the effect of computer interpretation messages using a web-based assessment tool is feasible, but the design needs to take clustered data into account. Pilot data suggest that computer messages influence paramedic interpretation, improving accuracy when correct and worsening accuracy when incorrect.
Keywords: ECG, interpretation; acute coronary syndrome; paramedics.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Similar articles
-
Paramedic ability to recognize ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction on prehospital electrocardiograms.Prehosp Emerg Care. 2013 Apr-Jun;17(2):203-10. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2012.755585. Epub 2013 Feb 12. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2013. PMID: 23402376
-
Can paramedics read ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction on prehospital 12-lead electrocardiograms?Prehosp Emerg Care. 2009 Apr-Jun;13(2):207-14. doi: 10.1080/10903120802706153. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2009. PMID: 19291559
-
Serial prehospital 12-lead electrocardiograms increase identification of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Prehosp Emerg Care. 2012 Jan-Mar;16(1):109-14. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2011.614045. Epub 2011 Sep 28. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2012. PMID: 21954895
-
Prehospital management of acute myocardial infarction: Electrocardiogram acquisition and interpretation, and thrombolysis by prehospital care providers.Can J Cardiol. 1998 Oct;14(10):1231-40. Can J Cardiol. 1998. PMID: 9852937 Review.
-
ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) bypass: The importance of paramedics in an integrated STEMI system of care.CJEM. 2018 Nov;20(6):813-815. doi: 10.1017/cem.2018.467. CJEM. 2018. PMID: 30484423 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
A Novel Algorithm for Improving the Prehospital Diagnostic Accuracy of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Prehosp Disaster Med. 2024 Feb;39(1):37-44. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X23006635. Epub 2023 Dec 4. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2024. PMID: 38047380 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy to Identify ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction on Interpretations of Prehospital Electrocardiograms.Circ Rep. 2022 May 25;4(7):289-297. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-22-0002. eCollection 2022 Jul 8. Circ Rep. 2022. PMID: 35860351 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prehospital ECG Interpretation Methods for ST-Elevation MI Detection and Catheterization Laboratory Activation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2025 May 22;13(1):e47. doi: 10.22037/aaemj.v13i1.2627. eCollection 2025. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2025. PMID: 40487909 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cross-classified multilevel models (CCMM) in health research: A systematic review of published empirical studies and recommendations for best practices.SSM Popul Health. 2020 Aug 29;12:100661. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100661. eCollection 2020 Dec. SSM Popul Health. 2020. PMID: 32964097 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical