Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun;19(9):1552-64.
doi: 10.1017/S1368980016000112. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

Breakfast frequency among adolescents: associations with measures of family functioning

Affiliations

Breakfast frequency among adolescents: associations with measures of family functioning

Trine Pagh Pedersen et al. Public Health Nutr. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate (i) associations between adolescents' frequency of breakfast and family functioning (close relations to parents, quality of family communication and family support) and (ii) if any observed associations between breakfast frequency and family functioning vary by sociodemographic factors.

Design: School-based cross-sectional study. Students completed a web-based questionnaire. Associations were estimated by multilevel multivariate logistic regression.

Setting: Danish arm of the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children study, 2014.

Subjects: Adolescents aged 13 and 15 years (n 3054) from a random sample of forty-one schools.

Results: Nearly one-quarter of the adolescents had low breakfast frequency. Low breakfast frequency was associated with low family functioning measured by three dimensions. The OR (95 % CI) of low breakfast frequency was 1·81 (1·40, 2·33) for adolescents who reported no close relations to parents, 2·28 (1·61, 3·22) for adolescents who reported low level of quality of family communication and 2·09 (1·39, 3·15) for adolescents who reported low level of family support. Joint effect analyses suggested that the odds of low breakfast frequency among adolescents with low family functioning compared with high family functioning were highest among adolescents being girls, immigrants and living in other than a traditional family structure.

Conclusions: Low breakfast frequency was associated with low family functioning measured by close relations to parents, quality of family communication and family support. Further, analyses suggested that the associations were more pronounced among girls, immigrants and adolescents from other family structure than traditional. The study highlights the importance of the family setting in promoting regular breakfast frequency among adolescents.

Keywords: Adolescents; Breakfast; Family functioning; Sociodemographic factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Odds ratios (with 95 % CI represented by vertical bars) for low breakfast frequency by combinations of close relations to parents and gender, adjusted for sociodemographic variables*, among adolescents (n 3054) aged 13 and 15 years, Danish arm of the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children study, 2014. Effect modification of the combination of no close relations to parents and being a girl: ratio of odds ratios=3·36/(1·46×1·60)=1·44 (95 % CI 0·86, 2·42); relative excess risk due to interaction=3·36–1·46–1·60+1=1·30 (95 % CI 0·19, 2·42). *Only the combinations that had an effect are illustrated (ref., reference category)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Odds ratios (with 95 % CI represented by vertical bars) for low breakfast frequency by combinations of quality of family communication and gender, adjusted for sociodemographic variables*, among adolescents (n 3054) aged 13 and 15 years, Danish arm of the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children study, 2014. Effect modification of the combination of low level of family communication and being a girl: ratio of odds ratios=4·78/(1·30×1·59)=2·32 (95 % CI 1·09, 4·96); relative excess risk due to interaction=4·78–1·30–1·59+1=2·89 (95 % CI 0·84, 4·95). *Only the combinations that had an effect are illustrated (ref., reference category)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Odds ratios (with 95 % CI represented by vertical bars) for low breakfast frequency by combinations of family support and gender, adjusted for sociodemographic variables*, among adolescents (n 3054) aged 13 and 15 years, Danish arm of the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children study, 2014. Effect modification of the combination of low level of family support and being a girl: ratio of odds ratios =3·98/(1·64×1·61)=1·51 (95 % CI 0·65, 3·52); relative excess risk due to interaction=3·98–1·64–1·61+1=1·73 (95 % CI –0·54, 4·00). *Only the combinations that had an effect are illustrated (ref., reference category)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nicklas TA, Baranowski T, Cullen KW et al.. (2001) Eating patterns, dietary quality and obesity. J Am Coll Nutr 20, 599–608. - PubMed
    1. Rampersaud GC, Pereira MA, Girard BL et al.. (2005) Breakfast habits, nutritional status, body weight, and academic performance in children and adolescents. J Am Diet Assoc 105, 743–760. - PubMed
    1. Mesas AE, Munoz-Pareja M, Lopez-Garcia E et al.. (2011) Selected eating behaviours and excess body weight: a systematic review. Obes Rev 13, 106–135. - PubMed
    1. Fabritius K & Rasmussen M (2008) Breakfast habits and overweight in Danish schoolchildren. The role of socioeconomic positions. Ugeskr Laeger 170, 2559–2563. - PubMed
    1. Szajewska H & Ruszczynski M (2010) Systematic review demonstrating that breakfast consumption influences body weight outcomes in children and adolescents in Europe. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 50, 113–119. - PubMed