Standardized EEG interpretation accurately predicts prognosis after cardiac arrest
- PMID: 26865516
- PMCID: PMC4836886
- DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002462
Standardized EEG interpretation accurately predicts prognosis after cardiac arrest
Abstract
Objective: To identify reliable predictors of outcome in comatose patients after cardiac arrest using a single routine EEG and standardized interpretation according to the terminology proposed by the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society.
Methods: In this cohort study, 4 EEG specialists, blinded to outcome, evaluated prospectively recorded EEGs in the Target Temperature Management trial (TTM trial) that randomized patients to 33°C vs 36°C. Routine EEG was performed in patients still comatose after rewarming. EEGs were classified into highly malignant (suppression, suppression with periodic discharges, burst-suppression), malignant (periodic or rhythmic patterns, pathological or nonreactive background), and benign EEG (absence of malignant features). Poor outcome was defined as best Cerebral Performance Category score 3-5 until 180 days.
Results: Eight TTM sites randomized 202 patients. EEGs were recorded in 103 patients at a median 77 hours after cardiac arrest; 37% had a highly malignant EEG and all had a poor outcome (specificity 100%, sensitivity 50%). Any malignant EEG feature had a low specificity to predict poor prognosis (48%) but if 2 malignant EEG features were present specificity increased to 96% (p < 0.001). Specificity and sensitivity were not significantly affected by targeted temperature or sedation. A benign EEG was found in 1% of the patients with a poor outcome.
Conclusions: Highly malignant EEG after rewarming reliably predicted poor outcome in half of patients without false predictions. An isolated finding of a single malignant feature did not predict poor outcome whereas a benign EEG was highly predictive of a good outcome.
© 2016 American Academy of Neurology.
Figures
Comment in
-
EEG and cardiac arrest: Divining prognosis at the bedside.Neurology. 2016 Apr 19;86(16):1470-1. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002472. Epub 2016 Feb 10. Neurology. 2016. PMID: 26865525 No abstract available.
-
Standardized EEG interpretation accurately predicts prognosis after cardiac arrest.Neurology. 2016 Oct 11;87(15):1631. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003276. Neurology. 2016. PMID: 27765824 No abstract available.
References
-
- Atwood C, Eisenberg MS, Herlitz J, Rea TD. Incidence of EMS-treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Europe. Resuscitation 2005;67:75–80. - PubMed
-
- Dragancea I, Rundgren M, Englund E, Friberg H, Cronberg T. The influence of induced hypothermia and delayed prognostication on the mode of death after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2013;84:337–342. - PubMed
-
- Oddo M, Rossetti AO. Predicting neurological outcome after cardiac arrest. Curr Opin Crit Care 2011;17:254–259. - PubMed
-
- Friberg H, Cronberg T, Dunser MW, Duranteau J, Horn J, Oddo M. Survey on current practices for neurological prognostication after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2015;90:158–162. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical