Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Apr 19;86(16):1482-90.
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002462. Epub 2016 Feb 10.

Standardized EEG interpretation accurately predicts prognosis after cardiac arrest

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Standardized EEG interpretation accurately predicts prognosis after cardiac arrest

Erik Westhall et al. Neurology. .

Abstract

Objective: To identify reliable predictors of outcome in comatose patients after cardiac arrest using a single routine EEG and standardized interpretation according to the terminology proposed by the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society.

Methods: In this cohort study, 4 EEG specialists, blinded to outcome, evaluated prospectively recorded EEGs in the Target Temperature Management trial (TTM trial) that randomized patients to 33°C vs 36°C. Routine EEG was performed in patients still comatose after rewarming. EEGs were classified into highly malignant (suppression, suppression with periodic discharges, burst-suppression), malignant (periodic or rhythmic patterns, pathological or nonreactive background), and benign EEG (absence of malignant features). Poor outcome was defined as best Cerebral Performance Category score 3-5 until 180 days.

Results: Eight TTM sites randomized 202 patients. EEGs were recorded in 103 patients at a median 77 hours after cardiac arrest; 37% had a highly malignant EEG and all had a poor outcome (specificity 100%, sensitivity 50%). Any malignant EEG feature had a low specificity to predict poor prognosis (48%) but if 2 malignant EEG features were present specificity increased to 96% (p < 0.001). Specificity and sensitivity were not significantly affected by targeted temperature or sedation. A benign EEG was found in 1% of the patients with a poor outcome.

Conclusions: Highly malignant EEG after rewarming reliably predicted poor outcome in half of patients without false predictions. An isolated finding of a single malignant feature did not predict poor outcome whereas a benign EEG was highly predictive of a good outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Highly malignant EEG patterns
Highly malignant patterns used in the study defined according to the standardized EEG terminology by the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society. (A) Suppressed background (amplitude <10 μV, 100% of the recording) without discharges. (B) Suppressed background with superimposed continuous periodic discharges. (C) Burst-suppression (periods of suppression with amplitude <10 μV constituting >50% of the recording) without discharges. (D) Burst-suppression with superimposed discharges.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Study flow chart of exclusion from and inclusion into the study
The recommended time point of prognostication was 72 hours after rewarming, corresponding to approximately 108 hours after the cardiac arrest. The most probable cause of death according to the treating physician is reported (cerebral, multiorgan failure, or cardiovascular). Eight study sites were included since they had an EEG system that allowed export of EEG data that included notations regarding testing of reactivity.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Atwood C, Eisenberg MS, Herlitz J, Rea TD. Incidence of EMS-treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Europe. Resuscitation 2005;67:75–80. - PubMed
    1. Dragancea I, Rundgren M, Englund E, Friberg H, Cronberg T. The influence of induced hypothermia and delayed prognostication on the mode of death after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2013;84:337–342. - PubMed
    1. Samaniego EA, Persoon S, Wijman CA. Prognosis after cardiac arrest and hypothermia: a new paradigm. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2011;11:111–119. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oddo M, Rossetti AO. Predicting neurological outcome after cardiac arrest. Curr Opin Crit Care 2011;17:254–259. - PubMed
    1. Friberg H, Cronberg T, Dunser MW, Duranteau J, Horn J, Oddo M. Survey on current practices for neurological prognostication after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2015;90:158–162. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms