Standardized EEG interpretation accurately predicts prognosis after cardiac arrest
- PMID: 26865516
- PMCID: PMC4836886
- DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002462
Standardized EEG interpretation accurately predicts prognosis after cardiac arrest
Abstract
Objective: To identify reliable predictors of outcome in comatose patients after cardiac arrest using a single routine EEG and standardized interpretation according to the terminology proposed by the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society.
Methods: In this cohort study, 4 EEG specialists, blinded to outcome, evaluated prospectively recorded EEGs in the Target Temperature Management trial (TTM trial) that randomized patients to 33°C vs 36°C. Routine EEG was performed in patients still comatose after rewarming. EEGs were classified into highly malignant (suppression, suppression with periodic discharges, burst-suppression), malignant (periodic or rhythmic patterns, pathological or nonreactive background), and benign EEG (absence of malignant features). Poor outcome was defined as best Cerebral Performance Category score 3-5 until 180 days.
Results: Eight TTM sites randomized 202 patients. EEGs were recorded in 103 patients at a median 77 hours after cardiac arrest; 37% had a highly malignant EEG and all had a poor outcome (specificity 100%, sensitivity 50%). Any malignant EEG feature had a low specificity to predict poor prognosis (48%) but if 2 malignant EEG features were present specificity increased to 96% (p < 0.001). Specificity and sensitivity were not significantly affected by targeted temperature or sedation. A benign EEG was found in 1% of the patients with a poor outcome.
Conclusions: Highly malignant EEG after rewarming reliably predicted poor outcome in half of patients without false predictions. An isolated finding of a single malignant feature did not predict poor outcome whereas a benign EEG was highly predictive of a good outcome.
© 2016 American Academy of Neurology.
Figures


Comment in
-
EEG and cardiac arrest: Divining prognosis at the bedside.Neurology. 2016 Apr 19;86(16):1470-1. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002472. Epub 2016 Feb 10. Neurology. 2016. PMID: 26865525 No abstract available.
-
Standardized EEG interpretation accurately predicts prognosis after cardiac arrest.Neurology. 2016 Oct 11;87(15):1631. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003276. Neurology. 2016. PMID: 27765824 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Prognostic Value of EEG in Patients after Cardiac Arrest-An Updated Review.Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2018 Mar 10;18(4):16. doi: 10.1007/s11910-018-0826-6. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2018. PMID: 29525975 Review.
-
Highly malignant routine EEG predicts poor prognosis after cardiac arrest in the Target Temperature Management trial.Resuscitation. 2018 Oct;131:24-28. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.07.024. Epub 2018 Jul 24. Resuscitation. 2018. PMID: 30053455 Clinical Trial.
-
Standardized EEG interpretation in patients after cardiac arrest: Correlation with other prognostic predictors.Resuscitation. 2018 May;126:143-146. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.03.012. Epub 2018 Mar 9. Resuscitation. 2018. PMID: 29530626
-
The Prognostic Value of 48-h Continuous EEG During Therapeutic Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest.Neurocrit Care. 2016 Apr;24(2):153-62. doi: 10.1007/s12028-015-0215-9. Neurocrit Care. 2016. PMID: 26567031
-
Electroencephalography as a Prognostic Tool after Cardiac Arrest.Semin Neurol. 2017 Feb;37(1):48-59. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1595815. Epub 2017 Feb 1. Semin Neurol. 2017. PMID: 28147418 Review.
Cited by
-
Post Cardiac Arrest Care in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2024 Feb;26(2):35-49. doi: 10.1007/s11886-023-02015-0. Epub 2024 Jan 12. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2024. PMID: 38214836 Review.
-
Adult Advanced Life Support: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.Resuscitation. 2020 Nov;156:A80-A119. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.09.012. Epub 2020 Oct 21. Resuscitation. 2020. PMID: 33099419 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic Value of EEG in Patients after Cardiac Arrest-An Updated Review.Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2018 Mar 10;18(4):16. doi: 10.1007/s11910-018-0826-6. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2018. PMID: 29525975 Review.
-
Stimulus-induced EEG-patterns and outcome after cardiac arrest.Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2021 Jul 21;6:219-224. doi: 10.1016/j.cnp.2021.07.001. eCollection 2021. Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2021. PMID: 34401610 Free PMC article.
-
Delayed Deterioration of EEG Background Rhythm Post-cardiac Arrest.Neurocrit Care. 2017 Jun;26(3):411-419. doi: 10.1007/s12028-016-0355-6. Neurocrit Care. 2017. PMID: 28004331
References
-
- Atwood C, Eisenberg MS, Herlitz J, Rea TD. Incidence of EMS-treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Europe. Resuscitation 2005;67:75–80. - PubMed
-
- Dragancea I, Rundgren M, Englund E, Friberg H, Cronberg T. The influence of induced hypothermia and delayed prognostication on the mode of death after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2013;84:337–342. - PubMed
-
- Oddo M, Rossetti AO. Predicting neurological outcome after cardiac arrest. Curr Opin Crit Care 2011;17:254–259. - PubMed
-
- Friberg H, Cronberg T, Dunser MW, Duranteau J, Horn J, Oddo M. Survey on current practices for neurological prognostication after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2015;90:158–162. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical