An open letter to The BMJ editors on qualitative research
- PMID: 26865572
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i563
An open letter to The BMJ editors on qualitative research
Erratum in
-
An open letter to The BMJ editors on qualitative research.BMJ. 2016 Feb 16;352:i957. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i957. BMJ. 2016. PMID: 26884317 No abstract available.
Comment in
-
Qualitative research and The BMJ.BMJ. 2016 Feb 10;352:i641. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i641. BMJ. 2016. PMID: 26865061 No abstract available.
-
Studies drawing on qualitative research are funded by the most prestigious research funders in the UK.BMJ. 2016 Mar 15;352:i1486. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1486. BMJ. 2016. PMID: 26979083 No abstract available.
-
Taking up the proposal of allocating one slot a month for a year to qualitative research.BMJ. 2016 Mar 15;352:i1469. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1469. BMJ. 2016. PMID: 26979348 No abstract available.
-
The BMJ editors respond.BMJ. 2016 Mar 15;352:i1492. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1492. BMJ. 2016. PMID: 26979466 No abstract available.
-
Reinventing qualitative research.BMJ. 2016 Mar 15;352:i1468. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1468. BMJ. 2016. PMID: 26979642 No abstract available.
-
The BMJ should not narrowly confine publication to positivist quantitative studies.BMJ. 2016 Mar 15;352:i1490. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1490. BMJ. 2016. PMID: 26979651 No abstract available.
-
By not publishing good qualitative research The BMJ is not fulfilling its values.BMJ. 2016 Mar 15;352:i1478. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1478. BMJ. 2016. PMID: 26979936 No abstract available.
-
Qualitative research can inform clinical practice.BMJ. 2016 Mar 15;352:i1482. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1482. BMJ. 2016. PMID: 26980313 No abstract available.
-
The BMJ should be adventurous and lead the way on qualitative research.BMJ. 2016 Mar 15;352:i1471. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1471. BMJ. 2016. PMID: 26980743 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources