Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2016 Apr;54(4):1101-7.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.03236-15. Epub 2016 Feb 10.

Performance of the New Aptima HCV Quant Dx Assay in Comparison to the Cobas TaqMan HCV2 Test for Use with the High Pure System in Detection and Quantification of Hepatitis C Virus RNA in Plasma or Serum

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Performance of the New Aptima HCV Quant Dx Assay in Comparison to the Cobas TaqMan HCV2 Test for Use with the High Pure System in Detection and Quantification of Hepatitis C Virus RNA in Plasma or Serum

Gunnar Schalasta et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Quantitating the level of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA is the standard of care for monitoring HCV-infected patients during treatment. The performances of commercially available assays differ for precision, limit of detection, and limit of quantitation (LOQ). Here, we compare the performance of the Hologic Aptima HCV Quant Dx assay (Aptima) to that of the Roche Cobas TaqMan HCV test, version 2.0, using the High Pure system (HPS/CTM), considered a reference assay since it has been used in trials defining clinical decision points in patient care. The assays' performance characteristics were assessed using HCV RNA reference panels and plasma/serum from chronically HCV-infected patients. The agreement between the assays for the 3 reference panels was good, with a difference in quantitation values of <0.5 log. High concordance was demonstrated between the assays for 245 clinical samples (kappa = 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.720 to 0.881); however, Aptima detected and/or quantitated 20 samples that HPS/CTM did not detect, while Aptima did not detect 1 sample that was quantitated by HPS/CTM. For the 165 samples quantitated by both assays, the values were highly correlated (R= 0.98;P< 0.0001). The linearity of quantitation from concentrations of 1.4 to 6 log was excellent for both assays for all HCV genotypes (GT) tested (GT 1a, 1b, 2b, and 3a) (R(2)> 0.99). The assays had similar levels of total and intra-assay variability across all genotypes at concentrations from 1,000 to 25 IU/ml. Aptima had a greater analytical sensitivity, quantitating more than 50% of replicates at 25-IU/ml target. Aptima showed performance characteristics comparable to those of HPS/CTM and increased sensitivity, making it suitable for use as a clinical diagnostic tool on the fully automated Panther platform.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Correlation between assays for patient samples. (A) Correlation analysis with samples quantified by both assays. Y = 1.026x − 0.04816; Pearson r = 0.9798; P < 0.0001. (B) Bland-Altman analysis of agreement between Aptima and HPS/CTM. The bold dashed line indicates the mean difference in assay values (Aptima − HPS/CTM). The two dotted lines indicate the 95% CI of the assays' agreement.
FIG 2
FIG 2
Linearity and influence of HCV genotype. Linearity was assessed using 4 clinical samples containing HCV subtypes 1a, 1b, 2b, and 3a, with seven dilution levels and target concentrations (in IU/ml) of 6 log, 5 log, 4 log, 3 log, 2 log, 1.7 log, and 1.4 log. Five replicates of each dilution level were tested side by side in each assay.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization (WHO). July 2015. Hepatitis C. Fact sheet no. 164. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs164/en/. Accessed 19 November 2015.
    1. World Health Organization (WHO). 2015. Hepatitis C in the WHO European Region. Fact sheet---July 2015. http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/communicable-diseases/hepatitis.... Accessed 19 November 2015.
    1. Lee MH, Yang HI, Yuan Y, L'Italien G, Chen CJ. 2014. Epidemiology and natural history of hepatitis C virus infection. World J Gastroenterol 20:9270–9280. doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i28.9270. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) and Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). 2015. Monitoring patients who are starting hepatitis C treatment, are on treatment, or have completed therapy. In HCV guidance: recommendations for testing, managing, and treating hepatitis C. http://www.hcvguidelines.org/full-report/monitoring-patients-who-are-sta.... Accessed 11 November 2015.
    1. European Association for the Study of the Liver. 2015. EASL recommendations on treatment of hepatitis C 2015. J Hepatol 63:199–236. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2015.03.025. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources