Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 May;54(5):1191-6.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.03394-15. Epub 2016 Feb 10.

The Past, Present, and (Possible) Future of Serologic Testing for Lyme Disease

Affiliations
Review

The Past, Present, and (Possible) Future of Serologic Testing for Lyme Disease

Elitza S Theel. J Clin Microbiol. 2016 May.

Abstract

Lyme disease prevails as the most commonly transmitted tick-borne infection in the United States, and serologic evaluation for antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi remains the recommended modality for diagnosis. This review presents a brief historical perspective on the evolution of serologic assays for Lyme disease and provides a summary of the performance characteristics for the currently recommended two-tiered testing algorithm (TTTA). Additionally, a recently proposed alternative to the traditional TTTA is discussed, and novel methodologies, including immuno-PCR and metabolic profiling for Lyme disease, are outlined.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Diagram of the two-tiered testing algorithm including interpretation and IgM/IgG blot positivity criteria for the United States. For individuals with more than 30 days of symptoms, IgM Western blot analysis should not be performed, or, if performed, the results should not be used to guide clinical decisions.
None

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hinckley AF, Connally NP, Meek JI, Johnson BJ, Kemperman MM, Feldman KA, White JL, Mead PS. 2014. Lyme disease testing by large commercial laboratories in the United States. Clin Infect Dis 59:676–681. doi:10.1093/cid/ciu397. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nelson CA, Saha S, Kugeler KJ, Delorey MJ, Shankar MB, Hinckley AF, Mead PS. 2015. Incidence of clinician-diagnosed Lyme disease, United States, 2005–2010. Emerg Infect Dis 21:1625–1631. doi:10.3201/eid2109.150417. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aguero-Rosenfeld ME, Wang G, Schwartz I, Wormser GP. 2005. Diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis. Clin Microbiol Rev 18:484–509. doi:10.1128/CMR.18.3.484-509.2005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alby K, Capraro GA. 2015. Alternatives to serologic testing for diagnosis of Lyme. Dis Clin Lab Med 35:815–825. doi:10.1016/j.cll.2015.07.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shapiro ED. 2014. Clinical practice. Lyme disease. N Engl J Med 370:1724–1731. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp1314325. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances