Excision Margins for Melanoma In Situ on the Head and Neck
- PMID: 26866286
- DOI: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000648
Excision Margins for Melanoma In Situ on the Head and Neck
Abstract
Background: Complete surgical excision of melanoma in situ (MIS) is curative. A 5-mm margin is often taken as the standard primary excision margin despite increasing evidence that this is frequently inadequate for tumor clearance.
Objective: To calculate the proportion of patients requiring >5 mm margin for clearance and to investigate any patient/lesion characteristics necessitating larger margins.
Materials and methods: Three hundred forty-three primary MIS cases on the head and neck treated in the authors' department by Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) over a 65-month period were retrospectively analyzed. Records were made of patient and lesion characteristics, and the total surgical margin for clearance calculated.
Results: Sixty-five percent were cleared by a 5-mm margin; for a 97% clearance rate, 15 mm was necessary. The increased clearance with additional margin was significant (p < .0001). Patient age, lesion site, and preoperative size did not predict margin.
Conclusion: These results verify that MIS on the head and neck can spread significantly beyond the clinical margin and demonstrate the importance of confirming clearance histologically before closure procedures. Mohs micrographic surgery has the advantage of total margin evaluation and where available it may be reasonable to start with a 5-mm margin. Where MMS is not a treatment option, the authors would advocate larger excision margins of ≥10 mm.
Similar articles
-
The use of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) for melanoma in situ (MIS) of the trunk and proximal extremities.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016 Nov;75(5):1015-1021. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.06.033. Epub 2016 Jul 26. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016. PMID: 27473456
-
Treating melanoma in situ and lentigo maligna with Mohs micrographic surgery in Australia.Australas J Dermatol. 2019 Feb;60(1):33-37. doi: 10.1111/ajd.12845. Epub 2018 Jun 22. Australas J Dermatol. 2019. PMID: 29932208
-
Mohs micrographic surgery is accurate 95.1% of the time for melanoma in situ: a prospective study of 167 cases.Dermatol Surg. 2008 May;34(5):660-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.34124.x. Epub 2008 Feb 6. Dermatol Surg. 2008. PMID: 18261099
-
Surgical margins for resection of primary cutaneous melanoma.Clin Dermatol. 2004 May-Jun;22(3):228-33. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2003.12.009. Clin Dermatol. 2004. PMID: 15262309 Review.
-
Treatment options in melanoma in situ: topical and radiation therapy, excision and Mohs surgery.Int J Dermatol. 2010 May;49(5):482-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2010.04423.x. Int J Dermatol. 2010. PMID: 20534080 Review.
Cited by
-
Recent advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of acral melanoma.J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2024 Feb 15;25(2):106-122. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B2300221. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2024. PMID: 38303495 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Outcomes of Melanoma In Situ Treated With Mohs Micrographic Surgery Compared With Wide Local Excision.JAMA Dermatol. 2017 May 1;153(5):436-441. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.6138. JAMA Dermatol. 2017. PMID: 28241261 Free PMC article.
-
Lentigo maligna melanoma with a history of cosmetic treatment: Prevalence, surgical outcomes and considerations.Lasers Surg Med. 2017 Nov;49(9):819-826. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22691. Epub 2017 May 29. Lasers Surg Med. 2017. PMID: 28555933 Free PMC article.
-
Histological Peripheral Margins and Recurrence of Melanoma In Situ Treated with Wide Local Excision.J Skin Cancer. 2020 Oct 29;2020:8813050. doi: 10.1155/2020/8813050. eCollection 2020. J Skin Cancer. 2020. PMID: 33178463 Free PMC article.
-
Very Rare Amelanotic Lentigo Maligna Melanoma with Skull Roof Invasion.Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2017 Jul 19;5(4):458-461. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2017.113. eCollection 2017 Jul 25. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2017. PMID: 28785332 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical