Prioritization of HCV treatment in the direct-acting antiviral era: An economic evaluation
- PMID: 26867489
- PMCID: PMC4914770
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.02.007
Prioritization of HCV treatment in the direct-acting antiviral era: An economic evaluation
Abstract
Background & aims: We determined the optimal HCV treatment prioritization strategy for interferon-free (IFN-free) HCV direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) by disease stage and risk status incorporating treatment of people who inject drugs (PWID).
Methods: A dynamic HCV transmission and progression model compared the cost-effectiveness of treating patients early vs. delaying until cirrhosis for patients with mild or moderate fibrosis, where PWID chronic HCV prevalence was 20, 40 or 60%. Treatment duration was 12weeks at £3300/wk, to achieve a 95% sustained viral response and was varied by genotype/stage in alternative scenarios. We estimated long-term health costs (in £UK=€1.3=$1.5) and outcomes as quality adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained using a £20,000 willingness to pay per QALY threshold. We ranked strategies with net monetary benefit (NMB); negative NMB implies delay treatment.
Results: The most cost-effective group to treat were PWID with moderate fibrosis (mean NMB per early treatment £60,640/£23,968 at 20/40% chronic prevalence, respectively), followed by PWID with mild fibrosis (NMB £59,258 and £19,421, respectively) then ex-PWID/non-PWID with moderate fibrosis (NMB £9,404). Treatment of ex-PWID/non-PWID with mild fibrosis could be delayed (NMB -£3,650). In populations with 60% chronic HCV among PWID it was only cost-effective to prioritize DAAs to ex-PWID/non-PWID with moderate fibrosis. For every one PWID in the 20% chronic HCV setting, 2 new HCV infections were averted. One extra HCV-related death was averted per 13 people with moderate disease treated. Rankings were unchanged with reduced drug costs or varied sustained virological response/duration by genotype/fibrosis stage.
Conclusions: Treating PWID with moderate or mild HCV with IFN-free DAAs is cost-effective compared to delay until cirrhosis, except when chronic HCV prevalence and reinfection risk is very high.
Keywords: Hepatitis C; People who inject drugs; Prevention; Treatment.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Figures
Comment in
-
Doing the math on hepatitis C virus treatment.J Hepatol. 2016 Jul;65(1):5-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.03.015. Epub 2016 Apr 2. J Hepatol. 2016. PMID: 27050632 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Shepard C.W., Finelli L., Alter M.J. Global epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5:558–567. - PubMed
-
- Gower E., Estes C., Blach S., Razavi-Shearer K., Razavi H. Global epidemiology and genotype distribution of the hepatitis C virus infection. J Hepatol. 2014;61:S45–S57. - PubMed
-
- De Angelis D., Sweeting M., Ades A.E., Hickman M., Hope V., Ramsay M. An evidence synthesis approach to estimating Hepatitis C Prevalence in England and Wales. Stat Methods Med Res. 2009;18:361–379. - PubMed
-
- Dore G.J., Feld J. Hepatitis C virus therapeutic development: in pursuit of perfectovir. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60:1829–1836. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases
