Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jul;65(1):17-25.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.02.007. Epub 2016 Feb 8.

Prioritization of HCV treatment in the direct-acting antiviral era: An economic evaluation

Affiliations

Prioritization of HCV treatment in the direct-acting antiviral era: An economic evaluation

Natasha K Martin et al. J Hepatol. 2016 Jul.

Abstract

Background & aims: We determined the optimal HCV treatment prioritization strategy for interferon-free (IFN-free) HCV direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) by disease stage and risk status incorporating treatment of people who inject drugs (PWID).

Methods: A dynamic HCV transmission and progression model compared the cost-effectiveness of treating patients early vs. delaying until cirrhosis for patients with mild or moderate fibrosis, where PWID chronic HCV prevalence was 20, 40 or 60%. Treatment duration was 12weeks at £3300/wk, to achieve a 95% sustained viral response and was varied by genotype/stage in alternative scenarios. We estimated long-term health costs (in £UK=€1.3=$1.5) and outcomes as quality adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained using a £20,000 willingness to pay per QALY threshold. We ranked strategies with net monetary benefit (NMB); negative NMB implies delay treatment.

Results: The most cost-effective group to treat were PWID with moderate fibrosis (mean NMB per early treatment £60,640/£23,968 at 20/40% chronic prevalence, respectively), followed by PWID with mild fibrosis (NMB £59,258 and £19,421, respectively) then ex-PWID/non-PWID with moderate fibrosis (NMB £9,404). Treatment of ex-PWID/non-PWID with mild fibrosis could be delayed (NMB -£3,650). In populations with 60% chronic HCV among PWID it was only cost-effective to prioritize DAAs to ex-PWID/non-PWID with moderate fibrosis. For every one PWID in the 20% chronic HCV setting, 2 new HCV infections were averted. One extra HCV-related death was averted per 13 people with moderate disease treated. Rankings were unchanged with reduced drug costs or varied sustained virological response/duration by genotype/fibrosis stage.

Conclusions: Treating PWID with moderate or mild HCV with IFN-free DAAs is cost-effective compared to delay until cirrhosis, except when chronic HCV prevalence and reinfection risk is very high.

Keywords: Hepatitis C; People who inject drugs; Prevention; Treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Results on the incremental cost-effectiveness plane showing the efficient frontiers for 20% (solid line), 40% (dashed grey line), and 60% (dashed black line) chronic prevalence scenarios for the ‘Future IFN-free DAA’ treatment scenario. Results shown for treatment of PWID populations (squares) and ex-non-injectors (diamonds) with moderate disease (grey squares) and mild disease (white squares) compared to delayed treatment at the compensated cirrhosis stage. Treatment scenarios which do not fall on the frontier are dominated (more expensive with fewer benefits). Costs/QALYs are incremental to treatment of all those with compensated cirrhosis and best supportive care for all others.

Comment in

  • Doing the math on hepatitis C virus treatment.
    Mehta SH, Thomas DL. Mehta SH, et al. J Hepatol. 2016 Jul;65(1):5-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.03.015. Epub 2016 Apr 2. J Hepatol. 2016. PMID: 27050632 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Shepard C.W., Finelli L., Alter M.J. Global epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5:558–567. - PubMed
    1. Gower E., Estes C., Blach S., Razavi-Shearer K., Razavi H. Global epidemiology and genotype distribution of the hepatitis C virus infection. J Hepatol. 2014;61:S45–S57. - PubMed
    1. De Angelis D., Sweeting M., Ades A.E., Hickman M., Hope V., Ramsay M. An evidence synthesis approach to estimating Hepatitis C Prevalence in England and Wales. Stat Methods Med Res. 2009;18:361–379. - PubMed
    1. Dore G.J., Feld J. Hepatitis C virus therapeutic development: in pursuit of perfectovir. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60:1829–1836. - PubMed
    1. Martin N.K., Vickerman P., Grebely J., Hellard M., Hutchinson S., Lima V. HCV treatment for prevention among people who inject drugs: modeling treatment scale-up in the age of direct-acting antivirals. Hepatology. 2013;58:1598–1609. - PMC - PubMed