Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2016 Apr;64(4):209-15.
doi: 10.1007/s11748-016-0626-3. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of triplet regimens of docetaxel/cisplatin/5-FU (DCF NAC) may improve patient prognosis of cStage II/III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma-propensity score analysis

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of triplet regimens of docetaxel/cisplatin/5-FU (DCF NAC) may improve patient prognosis of cStage II/III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma-propensity score analysis

Keishi Yamashita et al. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with CF (cisplatin/5-FU) was demonstrated to improve survival of clinical stage II/III (cStage II/III) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), however prognostic outcome remains unsatisfactory. We have recently reported preliminary potentiality of short-term survival benefit by NAC with DCF (docetaxel/cisplatin/5-FU).

Patients and methods: Thirty-eight ESCC patients who underwent DCF NAC between 2009 and 2012 were investigated for prognosis with a median follow-up period of 49 months as compared to those with CF NAC.

Results: (1) ESCC patients with DCF NAC showed 66% of 3-year progression-free survival (PFS), which is significantly superior to that of CF NAC (38%) (p = 0.018). ESCC patients with DCF NAC showed 79% of 3-year overall survival (OS), which is marginally significantly superior to that of CF NAC (65%) (p = 0.093). (2) The multivariate Cox proportional hazards model revealed that DCF NAC was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (p = 0.0013) and OS (p = 0.047), respectively, when adjusted for patient sex, age, cT, cN, and preoperative borderline resectability. (3) Patients with more advanced stage were rather frequently included in DCF NAC than in CF NAC, however there was no significant difference. Nevertheless, propensity score (PS) to predict DCF NAC was significantly higher than CF NAC (p = 0.019). (4) Both NAC and PS were again applied to the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, and DCF NAC was the only remnant prognostic indicator for PFS (p = 0.0044) and OS (p = 0.063).

Conclusion: Prognosis may be significantly improved in cStage II/III ESCC patients who underwent DCF NAC than those with CF NAC.

Keywords: DCF; Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; Neoadjuvant; Prognosis; Propensity score.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hepatogastroenterology. 2014 Jun;61(132):1042-8 - PubMed
    1. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2010 Nov;66(6):1159-65 - PubMed
    1. Dis Esophagus. 2001;14(2):98-103 - PubMed
    1. Semin Oncol. 1995 Dec;22(6 Suppl 13):3-16 - PubMed
    1. World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Nov 14;17(42):4660-74 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources