Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov;52(8):1098-1105.
doi: 10.1007/s10597-016-9992-7. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

Psychometric Properties of the Milestones of Recovery Scale-Older Adult Version

Affiliations

Psychometric Properties of the Milestones of Recovery Scale-Older Adult Version

Kristen L Hess et al. Community Ment Health J. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

The Milestones of Recovery Scale (MORS) is a tool that mental health professionals can use to track clients' recovery. It has been shown to have good reliability and validity in an adult population. It is important to demonstrate its psychometric properties among the elderly. This study assessed the reliability and validity of the MORS among a multi-ethnic (52 % White) sample of adults 54 and older (M = 67) at several mental health agencies in California. The clients, N = 432, were assessed by two raters each at two time points 2 weeks apart. Ratings were obtained on the MORS, the modified Global Assessment of Functioning scale (mGAF), and the Multnomah Community Ability Scale (MCAS). The MORS demonstrated acceptable reliability: inter-rater r = .65 and test-retest r = .71; the mGAF was .56 and .79; the MCAS was .66 and .85. The validity of the MORS was also supported: mGAF-MORS r = .68 and MCAS-MORS r = .74. This study lends support for the use of the MORS in older adult populations. In addition, this is the first report of the psychometric properties of the MCAS with an entirely older adult sample.

Keywords: GAF; MCAS; Mental illness; Older adults; Reliability; Validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Psychol Assess. 2003 Jun;15(2):205-15 - PubMed
    1. Psychosomatics. 1995 May-Jun;36(3):267-75 - PubMed
    1. Br J Clin Psychol. 2002 Nov;41(Pt 4):417-22 - PubMed
    1. Community Ment Health J. 2009 Aug;45(4):246-50 - PubMed
    1. Community Ment Health J. 2003 Apr;39(2):131-7 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources