Differential diagnosis of patients with abnormal serum creatine kinase isoenzymes

Abstract

For the diagnosis of myocardial injury, particularly AMI, CK-MB has become the gold standard. Changing CK-MB activities in serially collected blood from patients with suggestive signs and symptoms of AMI is almost pathognomonic for infarction. Nevertheless, an increased CK-MB cannot be equated with AMI owing to the many other types of inflammatory, traumatic, and miscellaneous forms of injury to the heart and the trace activities of CK-MB in skeletal muscle. Other enzyme tests for AMI are less efficient. In order of decreasing efficiency, the tests are CK-MB, CK, LD1 greater than LD2 or LD1/LD2 greater than 0.76, AST and LD; the latter two tests are not cost effective and add little or nothing when results for CK-MB, CK, and LD isoenzymes are available. The value of the isoforms of CK-MM and CK-MB remains to be established. Early evidence suggests that they could be helpful in the diagnosis of AMI; however, owing to the greater technical difficulties in performing these tests, their use is necessarily more restricted. Enzyme testing on admission and then every 12 hours for 2 days is sufficient and effective in making the initial diagnosis. In patients presenting early after an attack, CK and CK-MB are often normal. Decisions on AMI cannot be made on blood tests collected in the emergency department. Clot-lysing agents like streptokinase, urokinase, and tPA have changed the therapy of AMI dramatically. Enzyme tests clearly separate patients with and without successful therapeutic or spontaneous reperfusion. With successful reperfusion, the uniform finding has been a "washout" phenomenon with significantly earlier peaking times for CK and CK-MB. The isoforms of CK and myoglobin give the earliest peaks after successful reperfusion. With faster turnaround times for these tests, they may become important tools in patient management.