Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb 1:10:8.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00008. eCollection 2016.

Impaired Communication Between the Dorsal and Ventral Stream: Indications from Apraxia

Affiliations

Impaired Communication Between the Dorsal and Ventral Stream: Indications from Apraxia

Carys Evans et al. Front Hum Neurosci. .

Abstract

Patients with apraxia perform poorly when demonstrating how an object is used, particularly when pantomiming the action. However, these patients are able to accurately identify, and to pick up and move objects, demonstrating intact ventral and dorsal stream visuomotor processing. Appropriate object manipulation for skilled use is thought to rely on integration of known and visible object properties associated with "ventro-dorsal" stream neural processes. In apraxia, it has been suggested that stored object knowledge from the ventral stream may be less readily available to incorporate into the action plan, leading to an over-reliance on the objects' visual affordances in object-directed motor behavior. The current study examined grasping performance in left hemisphere stroke patients with (N = 3) and without (N = 9) apraxia, and in age-matched healthy control participants (N = 14), where participants repeatedly grasped novel cylindrical objects of varying weight distribution. Across two conditions, object weight distribution was indicated by either a memory-associated cue (object color) or visual-spatial cue (visible dot over the weighted end). Participants were required to incorporate object-weight associations to effectively grasp and balance each object. Control groups appropriately adjusted their grasp according to each object's weight distribution across each condition, whereas throughout the task two of the three apraxic patients performed poorly on both the memory-associated and visual-spatial cue conditions. A third apraxic patient seemed to compensate for these difficulties but still performed differently to control groups. Patients with apraxia performed normally on the neutral control condition when grasping the evenly weighted version. The pattern of behavior in apraxic patients suggests impaired integration of visible and known object properties attributed to the ventro-dorsal stream: in learning to grasp the weighted object accurately, apraxic patients applied neither pure knowledge-based information (the memory-associated condition) nor higher-level information given in the visual-spatial cue condition. Disruption to ventro-dorsal stream predicts that apraxic patients will have difficulty learning to manipulate new objects on the basis of information other than low-level visual cues such as shape and size.

Keywords: apraxia; grasping; ventro-dorsal stream; visual affordance; visual pathways model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Scan slices for apraxic patients AH, JA, and GW; lesioned areas were applied to a template scan allowing clear visualization of the anatomical landmarks. The lesion area(s) are in red. Left is right as per neurological convention.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(Left) Objects used in the main task. From top: neutral-control evenly weighted; left and right weighted visual-spatial “dot” cue; left weighted/green and right weighted/blue memory-associated. (Right) Schematic representation of the experimental setup.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(Top) Change in grasp accuracy between Trial 1 and Trial 5 across blocks, including standard error bars. (Bottom) Change in grasp accuracy between Block 1 and Block 5 across trials, including standard error bars. For both Trial and Block analyses a negative score indicates an improvement in performance across trials; a positive score indicates a reduced or consistently poor performance. Scores close to zero reflect consistent high accuracy across trials. The black bars at the top of the graphs indicate significant relationships: two asterisks denotes a p value < 0.001, and a single asterisk denotes a p value < 0.05.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Almeida J., Fintzi A. R., Mahon B. Z. (2013). Tool manipulation knowledge is retrieved by way of the ventral visual object processing pathway. Cortex 49, 2334–2344. 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.05.004 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barde L. H. F., Buxbaum L. J., Moll A. D. (2007). Abnormal reliance on object structure in apraxics’ learning of novel object-related actions. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 13, 997–1008. 10.1017/s1355617707070981 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baud-Bovy G., Soechting J. (2001). Visual localization of the center of mass of compact, asymmetric, two-dimensional shapes. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 27, 692–706. 10.1037/0096-1523.27.3.692 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bickerton W.-L., Samson D., Humphreys G. W. (2011). Separating forms of neglect using the apples test: validation and functional prediction in chronic and acute stroke. Neuropsychology 25, 567–580. 10.1037/a0023501 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Binkofski F., Buxbaum L. J. (2013). Two action systems in the human brain. Brain Lang. 127, 222–229. 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.07.007 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources