Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2016 Feb 12;11(2):e0149464.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149464. eCollection 2016.

Comparison of the Combined versus Conventional Apgar Scores in Predicting Adverse Neonatal Outcomes

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of the Combined versus Conventional Apgar Scores in Predicting Adverse Neonatal Outcomes

Hosein Dalili et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objectives: Assessing the value of the Combined-Apgar score in predicting neonatal mortality and morbidity compared to the Conventional-Apgar.

Methods: This prospective cohort study evaluated 942 neonates (166 very preterm, 233 near term, and 543 term) admitted to a tertiary referral hospital. At 1- and 5-minutes after delivery, the Conventional and Combined Apgar scores were recorded. The neonates were followed, and the following information was recorded: the occurrence of severe hyperbilirubinemia requiring medical intervention, the requirement for mechanical ventilation, the occurrence of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), and neonatal mortality.

Results: Before adjusting for the potential confounders, a low Conventional (<7) or Combined (<10) Apgar score at 5-minutes was associated with adverse neonatal outcomes. However, after adjustment for the gestational age, birth weight and the requirement for neonatal resuscitation in the delivery room, a depressed 5-minute Conventional-Apgar score lost its significant associations with all the measured adverse outcomes; after the adjustments, a low 5-minute Combined-Apgar score remained significantly associated with the requirement for mechanical ventilation (OR,18.61; 95%CI,6.75-51.29), IVH (OR,4.8; 95%CI,1.91-12.01), and neonatal mortality (OR,20.22; 95%CI,4.22-96.88). Additionally, using Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves, the area under the curve was higher for the Combined-Apgar than the Conventional-Apgar for the prediction of neonatal mortality and the measured morbidities among all the admitted neonates and their gestational age subgroups.

Conclusions: The newly proposed Combined-Apgar score can be a good predictor of neonatal mortality and morbidity in the admitted neonates, regardless of their gestational age and resuscitation status. It is also superior to the Conventional-Apgar in predicting adverse neonatal outcomes in very preterm, near term and term neonates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Apgar V. A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn infant. Curr Res Anesth Analg. 1953;32:260–267 - PubMed
    1. Marlow N. Do we need an Apgar score? Archives of disease in childhood. 1992;67:765–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li F, Wu T, Lei X, Zhang H, Mao M, Zhang J. The apgar score and infant mortality. PloS one. 2013;8:e69072 10.1371/journal.pone.0069072 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Iliodromiti S, Mackay DF, Smith GC, Pell JP, Nelson SM. Apgar score and the risk of cause-specific infant mortality: a population-based cohort study. The Lancet. 2014;384:1749–55. - PubMed
    1. Is the Apgar score outmoded? Lancet. 1989;1:591–92. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources