Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr 4;82(8):2347-2355.
doi: 10.1128/AEM.03693-15. Print 2016 Apr.

Genetic Diversity of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli Isolates from Conventional Broiler Flocks and the Impacts of Sampling Strategy and Laboratory Method

Affiliations

Genetic Diversity of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli Isolates from Conventional Broiler Flocks and the Impacts of Sampling Strategy and Laboratory Method

A B Vidal et al. Appl Environ Microbiol. .

Abstract

The genetic diversity of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coliisolates from commercial broiler farms was examined by multilocus sequence typing (MLST), with an assessment of the impact of the sample type and laboratory method on the genotypes of Campylobacter isolated. A total of 645C. jejuniand 106C. coli isolates were obtained from 32 flocks and 17 farms, with 47 sequence types (STs) identified. The Campylobacter jejuniisolates obtained by different sampling approaches and laboratory methods were very similar, with the same STs identified at similar frequencies, and had no major effect on the genetic profile of Campylobacter population in broiler flocks at the farm level. ForC. coli, the results were more equivocal. While some STs were widely distributed within and among farms and flocks, analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) revealed a high degree of genetic diversity among farms forC. jejuni, where farm effects accounted for 70.5% of variance, and among flocks from the same farm (9.9% of variance for C. jejuni and 64.1% forC. coli). These results show the complexity of the population structure of Campylobacterin broiler production and that commercial broiler farms provide an ecological niche for a wide diversity of genotypes. The genetic diversity of C. jejuni isolates among broiler farms should be taken into account when designing studies to understand Campylobacter populations in broiler production and the impact of interventions. We provide evidence that supports synthesis of studies on C. jejuni populations even when laboratory and sampling methods are not identical.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Frequency distribution of C. jejuni (n = 645) and C. coli (*) (n = 106) STs from 32 broiler flocks.
FIG 2
FIG 2
Bar chart showing the frequency distribution of C. jejuni (n = 645) and C. coli (*) (n = 106) STs between sample types. STs identified in 10 or fewer isolates were grouped into the category “Other.”
FIG 3
FIG 3
Unrooted neighbor-joining tree displaying the pairwise genetic distances (FST values) between C. jejuni populations from different flocks (H) from different farms (F). The same color represents isolates from flocks from the same farm. The FST values were calculated from nucleotide polymorphisms in the concatenated sequences from seven loci in the 645 C. jejuni isolates. All differences between flocks were significant at a P value of <0.05.
FIG 4
FIG 4
Unrooted neighbor-joining tree displaying the pairwise genetic distances (FST values) between C. coli populations from different flocks from different farms. The same color represents isolates from flocks from the same farm. The FST values were calculated from nucleotide polymorphisms in the concatenated sequences from seven loci in the 106 C. coli isolates. All differences between flocks were significant at a P value of <0.05.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ). 2011. Scientific opinion on Campylobacter in broiler meat production: control options and performance objectives and/or targets at different stages of the food chain. EFSA J 9(4):2015. http://www.efsa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/scientific_output/files/ma....
    1. Gillespie IA, O'Brien SJ, Frost JA, Adak GK, Horby P, Swan AV, Painter MJ, Neal KR, Campylobacter Sentinel Surveillance Scheme Collaborators. 2002. A case-case comparison of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni infection: a tool for generating hypotheses. Emerg Infect Dis 8:937–942. doi:10.3201/eid0809.010817. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tam CC, O'Brien SJ, Adak GK, Meakins SM, Frost JA. 2003. Campylobacter coli—an important foodborne pathogen. J Infect 47:28–32. doi:10.1016/S0163-4453(03)00042-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sopwith W, Birtles A, Matthews M, Fox A, Gee S, James S, Kempster J, Painter M, Edwards-Jones V, Osborn K, Regan M, Syed Q, Bolton E. 2010. Investigation of food and environmental exposures relating to the epidemiology of Campylobacter coli in humans in Northwest England. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:129–135. doi:10.1128/AEM.00942-09. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lawes JR, Vidal A, Clifton-Hadley FA, Sayers R, Rodgers J, Snow L, Evans SJ, Powell LF. 2012. Investigation of prevalence and risk factors for Campylobacter in broiler flocks at slaughter: results from a UK survey. Epidemiol Infect 140:1725–1737. doi:10.1017/S0950268812000982. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources