Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr;77(4):685-92.
doi: 10.1007/s00280-016-2975-0. Epub 2016 Feb 13.

Adaptive dosing of anticancer drugs in neonates: facilitating evidence-based dosing regimens

Affiliations

Adaptive dosing of anticancer drugs in neonates: facilitating evidence-based dosing regimens

Gareth J Veal et al. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: Selection of the most appropriate chemotherapy dosing regimens for neonates treated within the first weeks of life represents a significant clinical dilemma. Due to a lack of information relating to the clinical pharmacology of anticancer drugs in these challenging patients, current dosing guidelines are based on limited scientific rationale. In the current study, we investigate the utilisation of therapeutic drug monitoring approaches in neonates with localised hepatoblastoma, Wilms' tumour and stage 4S neuroblastoma, being treated with widely used anticancer drugs.

Methods: Plasma concentrations of cisplatin, vincristine, etoposide and carboplatin were quantified in two neonates being treated within the first 3 weeks of life and in a 32-week preterm infant treated at a gestational age of 40 weeks. Therapeutic drug monitoring was carried out where appropriate, based on the pharmacokinetic data obtained in conjunction with clinical response and toxicity.

Results: Treatment of a child aged 2 weeks with a recommended cisplatin dose reduction for weight to 1.8 mg/kg resulted in achievement of unbound cisplatin plasma concentrations of 0.01-0.08 µg/mL, markedly lower than exposures previously reported in infants and older children. A dose increase to 2.7 mg/kg was implemented, leading to the achievement of levels more in-line with those previously reported. This increased dose level was well tolerated over six courses of treatment, resulting in a good response to cisplatin monotherapy and the patient remains in remission at 3.5 years. In contrast, a 50 % vincristine dose reduction for weight in a 3-week-old neonate resulted in plasma concentrations comparable to levels observed in older children, leading to successful treatment and continued remission at 2 years. In a third patient, etoposide and carboplatin clearance values normalised to body weight were comparable to those reported in older children, resulting in comparatively lower exposures following reduced dosing.

Conclusions: The current report provides unique data on the pharmacokinetics of several widely used anticancer drugs in neonates treated within the first few weeks of life. The provision of these data acts as a useful reference point to support future dosing decisions to be made by clinicians in the treatment of these challenging patients.

Keywords: Carboplatin; Chemotherapy; Cisplatin; Etoposide; Hepatoblastoma; Neonates; Neuroblastoma; Therapeutic drug monitoring; Vincristine; Wilms’ tumour.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Plasma concentrations of unbound and total cisplatin measured in patient 001 following treatment with cisplatin administered as a 24-h intravenous infusion at a dose of 1.8 mg/kg at 2 weeks of age on course 1 (a) and a dose of 2.7 mg/kg at 4 weeks of age on course 2 (b)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Relationship between patient body weight and unbound cisplatin clearance normalised to body weight in a paediatric patient population (data from a previously published study [17] with data included from patient 001 shown in red)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Plasma concentrations of vincristine measured in patient 002 following short intravenous administration of a single dose of 0.75 mg/m2 (0.05 mg/kg)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Besunder JB, Reed MD, Blumer JL. Principles of drug biodisposition in the neonate (part I) Clin Pharmacokinet. 1988;14:189–216. doi: 10.2165/00003088-198814040-00001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kearns GL, Abdel-Rahman SM, Alander SW, Blowey DL, Leeder JS, Kauffman RE. Developmental pharmacology—drug disposition, action and therapy in infants and children. New Engl J Med. 2003;349:1157–1167. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra035092. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adamson PC. It’s not easy being small. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010;54:341–343. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22343. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bartelink IH, Rademaker CM, Schobben AF, van den Anker JN. Guidelines on paediatric dosing on the basis of development physiology and pharmacokinetic considerations. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2006;45:1077–1097. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200645110-00003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van den Berg H, van den Anker JN, Beijnen JH. Cytostatic drugs in infants: a review on pharmacokinetic data in infants. Cancer Treat Rev. 2012;38:3–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2011.03.005. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources