Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug 11;35(32):4235-43.
doi: 10.1038/onc.2015.488. Epub 2016 Feb 15.

Disruption of insulin receptor function inhibits proliferation in endocrine-resistant breast cancer cells

Affiliations

Disruption of insulin receptor function inhibits proliferation in endocrine-resistant breast cancer cells

J Y Chan et al. Oncogene. .

Abstract

The insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system is a well-studied growth regulatory pathway implicated in breast cancer biology. Clinical trials testing monoclonal antibodies directed against the type I IGF receptor (IGF1R) in combination with estrogen receptor-α (ER) targeting have been completed, but failed to show benefits in patients with endocrine-resistant tumors compared to ER targeting alone. We have previously shown that the closely related insulin receptor (InsR) is expressed in tamoxifen-resistant (TamR) breast cancer cells. Here we examined if inhibition of InsR affected TamR breast cancer cells. InsR function was inhibited by three different mechanisms: InsR short hairpin RNA, a small InsR-blocking peptide, S961 and an InsR monoclonal antibody (mAb). Suppression of InsR function by these methods in TamR cells successfully blocked insulin-mediated signaling, monolayer proliferation, cell cycle progression and anchorage-independent growth. This strategy was not effective in parental cells likely because of the presence of IGFR /InsR hybrid receptors. Downregulation of IGF1R in conjunction with InsR inhibition was more effective in blocking IGF- and insulin-mediated signaling and growth in parental cells compared with single-receptor targeting alone. Our findings show TamR cells were stimulated by InsR and were not sensitive to IGF1R inhibition, whereas in tamoxifen-sensitive parental cancer cells, the presence of both receptors, especially hybrid receptors, allowed cross-reactivity of ligand-mediated activation and growth. To suppress the IGF system, targeting of both IGF1R and InsR is optimal in endocrine-sensitive and -resistant breast cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure of any potential conflicts of interest:

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. TamR breast cancer cells were more sensitive to insulin treatment compared to their parental cells
(A) MCF-7L and T47D cells were plated, serum starved for 24 hours and treated with increasing concentrations of insulin for 15 minutes. Whole cell lysates were collected, separated by SDS-PAGE and subjected to the indicated immunoblotting analyses. (B) Cell monolayer growth of MCF-7L and T47D were measured using MTT proliferation assay. Cells were serum starved for 24 hours and then treated with increasing concentrations of insulin. Readings were taken 5 days later. The results were normalized to untreated group. (C) Anchorage-independent growth assay was carried out on MCF-7L and T47D cells. Colonies formed were counted 14 days and 20 days later, respectively. Values were normalized to untreated group and were presented as fold change (mean ± SD, n=3).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Insulin receptor knockdown reduced insulin-regulated signaling and growth in TamR cells, but not in parental cells
MCF-7L and T47D and their counter TamR cells were InsR knock-downed with lentiviral shRNA (shIR#2, shIR#6) or plasmid control (shSrcb or pLKO.1). InsR protein and mRNA expression levels were respectively determined using Western blot analyses as shown in lentiviral transduced (A) MCF-7L and T47D cells and qRT-PCR as shown in (B) MCF-7L and T47D cells. Cells were plated, serum started for 24 hours and treated with or without 10nM insulin for 15 minutes. Whole cell lysates were collected, separated by SDS-PAGE and subjected for indicated immunoblotting analyses. For qRT-PCR analysis, total RNA was collected from cells in full media. Data was normalized to housekeeping gene, GAPDH. Results represent mean ± SD of triplicates from three independent experiments. (C) Cell monolayer growth was determined using MTT assay. Transduced MCF-7L and TamR cells were serum starved for 24 hours and treated with or without insulin for 5 days. (D) Anchorage-independent growth of lentiviral transduced MCF-7L and T47D was measured after 19 days and 25 days, respectively. Values were normalized to untreated group and were represented in fold change (mean ± SD, n=3). Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni comparison was performed to identify significance among untreated versus treated groups and shIR versus control groups. *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01.
Figure 3
Figure 3. S961 inhibited insulin-stimulated PI3K/MAPK signaling and growth in MCF-7L TamR cells, but not in parental cells
(A) MCF-7L and TamR cells were serum starved overnight and pre-treated with varying concentrations of S961 for 30 minutes before treating the cells with either 10nM insulin or 5nM IGF-I for 10 minutes. Whole cell lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted for indicated antibodies. (B) Anchorage-independent growth assay was carried out on MCF-7L and TamR cells treated with varying concentrations of S961 and either 10nM insulin or 5nM IGF-I. Treatments were spiked in after 7 days. Colonies formed were counted 14 days later. Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni comparison was performed to compare between treated and untreated group. *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01. (C) Cell cycle analysis was performed using flow cytometry. MCF-7L and TamR cells were plated, serum starved for 8 hours before treating with varying concentrations of S961 and either 10nM insulin or 5nM IGF-I overnight.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Monoclonal antibody clone 83-7 against insulin receptor (83-7) downregulated insulin receptor, inhibiting insulin-stimulated signaling and growth in TamR cells
(A) MCF-7L and T47D cells were serum starved and pre-treated with 2 μg/mL of 83-7 overnight before treating with either 5nM IGF-I, 10nM IGF-II or 10nM insulin for 15 minutes. Whole cell lysate were collected, separated by SDS-PAGE and subjected for indicated immunoblotting analyses. Anchorage-independent growth assay was carried out on (B) MCF-7L and T47D cells treated with 2 μg/mL of 83-7 without or with either 10nM IGF-I or 10nM insulin. Colonies formed were counted 14 days for MCF-7Ls and 21 days for T47D cells after first plated. Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni comparison was performed to identify significance among untreated vs. treated groups. *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Inhibition of InsR via S961 and shIR was not effective in parental cells due to the presence of IGF1R/InsR hybrid receptors
The presence of IGF1R/InsR hybrid receptors was identified via immunoprecipitation (IP). (A) Whole cell lysates were collected in full media and immunoprecipitated with either anti-InsR antibody or mouse IgG overnight. IP was then resolved with SDS-PAGE and subjected for IGF1R immunoblotting. (B) MCF-7L parental cells were serum starved overnight, pre-treated with 20 μg/mL HuEM164 for 3 hours and varying concentrations of S961 for 30 minutes before exposing toeither 10nM insulin or 5nM IGF-I for 10 minutes. Whole cell lysates were collected, separated by SDS-PAGE and subjected for immunoblotting analyses. (C) Lentiviral transduced MCF-7L cells were serum starved overnight and pre-treated with 20 μg/mL HuEM164 overnight before exposing to either 10nM insulin or 5nM IGF-I for 15 minutes. Whole cell lysates were collected, separated by SDS-PAGE and subjected for indicated immunoblotting analyses.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nadji M, Gomez-Fernandez C, Ganjei-Azar P, Morales AR. Immunohistochemistry of estrogen and progesterone receptors reconsidered: experience with 5,993 breast cancers. Am J Clin Pathol. 2005;123:21–7. - PubMed
    1. Macaskill EJ, Renshaw L, Dixon JM. Neoadjuvant use of hormonal therapy in elderly patients with early or locally advanced hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Oncologist. 2006;11:1081–8. - PubMed
    1. Paridaens RJ, Dirix LY, Beex LV, Nooij M, Cameron DA, Cufer T, et al. Phase III study comparing exemestane with tamoxifen as first-line hormonal treatment of metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women: the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:4883–90. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ring A, Dowsett M. Mechanisms of tamoxifen resistance. Endocrine-related cancer. 2004;11:643–58. - PubMed
    1. Giuliano M, Schifp R, Osborne CK, Trivedi MV. Biological mechanisms and clinical implications of endocrine resistance in breast cancer. Breast. 2011;20(Suppl 3):S42–9. - PubMed

MeSH terms