Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Feb 14;22(6):1925-34.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i6.1925.

Surveillance of colonic polyps: Are we getting it right?

Affiliations
Review

Surveillance of colonic polyps: Are we getting it right?

Stewart N Bonnington et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide. The identification of colonic polyps can reduce CRC mortality through earlier diagnosis of cancers and the removal of polyps: the precursor lesion of CRC. Following the finding and removal of colonic polyps at an initial colonoscopy, some patients are at an increased risk of developing CRC in the future. This is the rationale for post-polypectomy surveillance colonoscopy. However, not all individuals found to have colonic adenomas have a risk of CRC higher than that of the general population. This review examines the literature on post-polypectomy surveillance including current international clinical guidelines. The potential benefits of surveillance procedures must be weighed against the burden of colonoscopy: resource use, the potential for patient discomfort, and the risk of complications. Therefore surveillance colonoscopy is best utilised in a selected group of individuals at a high risk of developing cancer. Further study is needed into the specific factors conferring higher risk as well as the efficacy of surveillance in mitigating this risk. Such evidence will better inform clinicians and patients of the relative benefits of colonoscopic surveillance for the individual. In addition, the decision to continue with surveillance must be informed by the changing profile of risks and benefits of further procedures with the patient's advancing age.

Keywords: Adenoma; Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer; Polyp; Surveillance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cancer Research UK. Bowel Cancer Statistics. Cancer Research UK, 2015. Accessed January 2016. Available from: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/bowel-cancer-inciden....
    1. American Cancer Society. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2014. Colorectal Cancer Facts & Figures 2014-2016. Available from: http://www.cancer.org/
    1. Vogelstein B, Fearon ER, Hamilton SR, Kern SE, Preisinger AC, Leppert M, Nakamura Y, White R, Smits AM, Bos JL. Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:525–532. - PubMed
    1. Nowell PC. Mechanisms of tumor progression. Cancer Res. 1986;46:2203–2207. - PubMed
    1. Risio M. The natural history of adenomas. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010;24:271–280. - PubMed