A survey on retention practice among orthodontists in Malaysia
- PMID: 26877981
- PMCID: PMC4751300
- DOI: 10.4041/kjod.2016.46.1.36
A survey on retention practice among orthodontists in Malaysia
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate retention practices commonly employed by orthodontists. The objectives were to identify the types of retainer frequently used and to investigate the variations in retention practice.
Methods: A total of 97 orthodontists were randomly selected, and a questionnaire consisting of 25 multiple-choice questions sent to them by mail. Upon receiving of the completed questionnaires, the data were statistically analyzed.
Results: A total of 32 responses were received; among these, 59.4% of orthodontists' practiced is in a government setting and 40.6% were in private practice. A vacuum-formed retainer was the most commonly used removable retainer for both maxillary (46.9%) and mandibular (46.9%) arches, followed by a Hawley retainer (maxilla, 43.8%; mandible, 37.5%), and a fixed retainer (maxilla, 3.1%; mandible, 9.4%). Of the responding orthodontists, 78.1% prescribed full-time wear (more than 20 h per day) for a duration of 3-9 months for a maxillary arch, compared to 71.9% for the mandibular arch. Only 18.8% of the orthodontists prescribed part-time wear of the retainer for the maxillary arch, compared to 21.9% for the mandibular arch. The majority of orthodontists did not instruct their patients to stop wearing removable retainers (71.9%) or fixed retainers (66.8%) at any specific time and they preferred their patients to continue wearing retainers.
Conclusions: Vacuum-formed retainers are the most commonly used retainers among orthodontists. The majority of orthodontists prescribed full-time wear for more than 20 h per day with a duration of 3-9 months and preferred indefinite use of the retainer.
Keywords: Hawley retainer; Retention practice; Vacuum-formed retainer.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no commercial, proprietary, or financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.
Figures
References
-
- Johnston C, Burden D, Morris D. Clinical guidelines: Orthodontic retention. London: Royal College of Surgeons; 2008. Revised November 2008.
-
- Renkema AM, Sips ET, Bronkhorst E, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. A survey on orthodontic retention procedures in The Netherlands. Eur J Orthod. 2009;31:432–437. - PubMed
-
- Littlewood SJ, Millett DT, Doubleday B, Bearn DR, Worthington HV. Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(1):CD002283. - PubMed
-
- Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Vogels DS., 3rd 2002 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures. Part 1. Results and trends. J Clin Orthod. 2002;36:553–568. - PubMed
-
- Wong PM, Freer TJ. A comprehensive survey of retention procedures in Australia and New Zealand. Aust Orthod J. 2004;20:99–106. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical