Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb;4(2):E222-7.
doi: 10.1055/s-0041-110771. Epub 2016 Jan 15.

Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty with 1-year follow-up: factors predictive of success

Affiliations

Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty with 1-year follow-up: factors predictive of success

G Lopez-Nava et al. Endosc Int Open. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Background and study aims: Bariatric endoscopy has emerged as an aid in the nonsurgical treatment of obesity. The objective of this study is to critically provide the results and follow-up of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty 1 year after the procedure.

Patients and methods: Prospective single-center follow-up study of 25 patients (5 men, 20 women) who underwent flexible endoscopic suturing for endoluminal gastric volume reduction. A multidisciplinary team provided post-procedure care. Patient outcomes were recorded at 1 year after the procedure. Linear regression analysis was done to evaluate the variables associated with best results at 1 year of follow-up.

Results: Mean body mass index (BMI) was 38.5 ± 4.6 kg/m(2) (range 30 - 47) and mean age 44.5 ± 8.2 years (range 29 - 60). At 1 year, 22 patients continued with the follow-up (2 dropped out at 6 months and 1 at 3 months). There were no major intra-procedural, early, or delayed adverse events. Mean BMI loss was 7.3 ± 4.2 kg/m(2), and mean percentage of total body weight loss was 18.7 ± 10.7 at 1 year. In the linear regression analysis, adjusted by initial BMI, variables associated with %TBWL involved the frequency of nutritional (β = 0.563, P = 0.014) and psychological contacts (β = 0.727, P = 0.025). The number of nutritional and psychological contacts were predictive of good weight loss results.

Conclusions: Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty is a feasible, reproducible, and effective procedure to treat obesity. Nutritional and psychological interaction are predictive of success.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing intersts: Dr. Lopez-Nava and Dr. Galvao are consultants for Apollo Endosurgery in the United States.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Relationship between nutritional follow-up controls per year and weight loss parameters.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Relationship between psychological follow-up controls per year and weight loss parameters.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Change in eating, sleep and sedentary habits: initial and 1-year prevalence.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Contrast Rx image of the endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty with the greater curvature modified by a line of sutured plications (the arrows indicate the location of the plications) at 1 year post-procedure
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Luminal endoscopic view of the gastric body reduced into a tubular configuration at 1 year post- procedure

References

    1. Abu Dayyeh B K, Thompson C C. Obesity and bariatrics for the endoscopist: New techniques. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2011;4:433–442. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fogel R, De Fogel J, Bonilla Y. et al.Clinical experience of transoral suturing for an endoluminal vertical gastroplasty: 1-year follow-up in 64 patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68:51–58. - PubMed
    1. Brethauer S A, Chand B, Schauer P R. et al.Transoral gastric volume reduction for weight management: technique and feasibility in 18 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:689–694. - PubMed
    1. Abu Dayyeh B K, Rajan E, Gostout C J. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty: a potential endoscopic alternative to surgical sleeve gastrectomy for treatment of obesity. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78:530–535. - PubMed
    1. Lopez-Nava G, Galvão M P, da Bautista-Castaño I. et al.Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty for the treatment of obesity. Endoscopy. 2015;47:449–452. - PubMed