Authors' Reply to Letter to the Editor "Comparing Sedation Regimens for Awake Fiberoptic Intubation"
- PMID: 26879034
- PMCID: PMC4800861
- DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.176089
Authors' Reply to Letter to the Editor "Comparing Sedation Regimens for Awake Fiberoptic Intubation"
Comment on
-
Dexmedetomidine-midazolam versus Sufentanil-midazolam for Awake Fiberoptic Nasotracheal Intubation: A Randomized Double-blind Study.Chin Med J (Engl). 2015 Dec 5;128(23):3143-8. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.170260. Chin Med J (Engl). 2015. PMID: 26612286 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparing Sedation Regimens for Awake Fiberoptic Intubation.Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 Feb 20;129(4):502-3. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.176087. Chin Med J (Engl). 2016. PMID: 26879033 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Xue FS, Liu HP, He N, Xu YC, Yang QY, Liao X, et al. Spray-as-you-go airway topical anesthesia in patients with a difficult airway: A randomized, double-blind comparison of 2% and 4% lidocaine. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:536–43. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818f1665. - PubMed
-
- Jiang H, Miao HS, Jin SQ, Chen LH, Tian JL. A pilot study of the effect of pressure-driven lidocaine spray on airway topical anesthesia for conscious sedation intubation. Chin Med J. 2011;124:3997–4001. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2011.23.028. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
