Dispositional optimism and therapeutic expectations in early-phase oncology trials
- PMID: 26882017
- PMCID: PMC4828311
- DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29908
Dispositional optimism and therapeutic expectations in early-phase oncology trials
Abstract
Background: Prior research has identified unrealistic optimism as a bias that might impair informed consent among patient-subjects in early-phase oncology trials. However, optimism is not a unitary construct; it also can be defined as a general disposition, or what is called dispositional optimism. The authors assessed whether dispositional optimism would be related to high expectations for personal therapeutic benefit reported by patient-subjects in these trials but not to the therapeutic misconception. The authors also assessed how dispositional optimism related to unrealistic optimism.
Methods: Patient-subjects completed questionnaires designed to measure expectations for therapeutic benefit, dispositional optimism, unrealistic optimism, and the therapeutic misconception.
Results: Dispositional optimism was found to be significantly associated with higher expectations for personal therapeutic benefit (Spearman rank correlation coefficient [r], 0.333; P<.0001), but was not associated with the therapeutic misconception (Spearman r, -0.075; P = .329). Dispositional optimism was found to be weakly associated with unrealistic optimism (Spearman r, 0.215; P = .005). On multivariate analysis, both dispositional optimism (P = .02) and unrealistic optimism (P<.0001) were found to be independently associated with high expectations for personal therapeutic benefit. Unrealistic optimism (P = .0001), but not dispositional optimism, was found to be independently associated with the therapeutic misconception.
Conclusions: High expectations for therapeutic benefit among patient-subjects in early-phase oncology trials should not be assumed to result from misunderstanding of specific information regarding the trials. The data from the current study indicate that these expectations are associated with either a dispositionally positive outlook on life or biased expectations concerning specific aspects of trial participation. Not all manifestations of optimism are the same, and different types of optimism likely have different consequences for informed consent in early-phase oncology research.
Keywords: cancer research; dispositional optimism; informed consent; therapeutic misconception; therapeutic optimism.
© 2016 American Cancer Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Variations in Unrealistic Optimism Between Acceptors and Decliners of Early Phase Cancer Trials.J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2017 Oct;12(4):280-288. doi: 10.1177/1556264617720433. Epub 2017 Jul 21. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2017. PMID: 28728498 Free PMC article.
-
Informed Consent, Therapeutic Misconception, and Unrealistic Optimism.Perspect Biol Med. 2020;63(2):359-373. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2020.0024. Perspect Biol Med. 2020. PMID: 33416658
-
Perceptions of control and unrealistic optimism in early-phase cancer trials.J Med Ethics. 2018 Feb;44(2):121-127. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103724. Epub 2017 Aug 3. J Med Ethics. 2018. PMID: 28774957
-
Hope for better treatment in participating clinical drug trials.Duodecim. 2017;133(6):587-91. Duodecim. 2017. PMID: 29243475 Review.
-
Therapeutic misconception and clinical trials in sub-Saharan Africa: a review.East Afr Med J. 2009 Jun;86(6):291-9. doi: 10.4314/eamj.v86i6.54142. East Afr Med J. 2009. PMID: 20358792 Review.
Cited by
-
Health Behaviours and the Sense of Optimism in Nursing Students in Poland, Spain and Slovakia during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 18;19(4):2388. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042388. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35206576 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of research participation versus usual clinical care in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal disorders: a prospective cohort study.RMD Open. 2023 Oct;9(4):e003414. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003414. RMD Open. 2023. PMID: 37797965 Free PMC article.
-
Integrating Palliative Care for Patients on Clinical Trials: Opportunities for Oncology Nurses.Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2020 Jun 26;7(3):243-249. doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_2_20. eCollection 2020 Jul-Sep. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2020. PMID: 32642494 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative ethnographies of medical research: materiality, social relations, citizenship and hope in Tanzania and Sierra Leone.Int Health. 2020 Nov 9;12(6):575-583. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihaa071. Int Health. 2020. PMID: 33165554 Free PMC article.
-
Well-Being of Child and Family Participants in Phase 1 Pediatric Oncology Clinical Trials.Oncol Nurs Forum. 2018 Sep 1;45(5):E67-E97. doi: 10.1188/18.ONF.E67-E97. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2018. PMID: 30118445 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Miller Franklin G, Joffe Steven. Benefit in phase 1 oncology trials: therapeutic misconception or reasonable treatment option? Clinical Trials. 2008;5(6):617–623. - PubMed
-
- Appelbaum PS, Roth H, Lidz CW, et al. False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. The Hastings Center Report. 1987;12(2):20–24. - PubMed
-
- Horng S, Grady C. Misunderstanding in clinical research: distinguishing therapeutic misconception, therapeutic misestimation, & therapeutic optimism. IRB: Ethics and Human Research. 2003;25(2):11–16. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources