The Relationship between GRACE Score and Epicardial Fat Thickness in non-STEMI Patients
- PMID: 26885974
- PMCID: PMC4811274
- DOI: 10.5935/abc.20160024
The Relationship between GRACE Score and Epicardial Fat Thickness in non-STEMI Patients
Abstract
Background: GRACE risk score (GS) is a scoring system which has a prognostic significance in patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (non-STEMI).
Objective: The present study aimed to determine whether end-systolic or end-diastolic epicardial fat thickness (EFT) is more closely associated with high-risk non-STEMI patients according to the GS.
Methods: We evaluated 207 patients who had non-STEMI beginning from October 2012 to February 2013, and 162 of them were included in the study (115 males, mean age: 66.6 ± 12.8 years). End-systolic and end-diastolic EFTs were measured with echocardiographic methods. Patients with high in-hospital GS were categorized as the H-GS group (in hospital GS > 140), while other patients were categorized as the low-to-moderate risk group (LM-GS).
Results: Systolic and diastolic blood pressures of H-GS patients were lower than those of LM-GS patients, and the average heart rate was higher in this group. End-systolic EFT and end-diastolic EFT were significantly higher in the H-GS group. The echocardiographic assessment of right and left ventricles showed significantly decreased ejection fraction in both ventricles in the H-GS group. The highest correlation was found between GS and end-diastolic EFT (r = 0.438).
Conclusion: End-systolic and end-diastolic EFTs were found to be increased in the H-GS group. However, end-diastolic EFT and GS had better correlation than end-systolic EFT and GS.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures
Comment in
-
The Relation between Epicardial Fat Thickness and Prognostic Risk Scores.Arq Bras Cardiol. 2016 Dec;107(6):607. doi: 10.5935/abc.20160185. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 28558080 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Jneid H, Anderson JL, Wright RS, Adams CD, Bridges CR, Casey DE, et al. American College of Cardiology Foundation. American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines 2012 ACCF/AHA Focused Update of the Guideline or the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (Updating the 2007 Guideline and Replacing the 2011 Focused Update): A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Diretrizes 2012 Writing Committee Members. Circulation. 2012;126(7):875–910. - PubMed
-
- Hamm CW, Bassand JP, Agewall S, Bax J, Boersma E, Bueno H, et al. ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eur Heart J. 2011;32(23):2999–3054. - PubMed
-
- Teijeira-Fernandez E, Eiras S, Shamagian LG, Shamagian LG, Somoza AS, Delgado C, et al. Lower epicardial adipose tissue adiponectin in patients with metabolic syndrome. Cytokine. 2011;54(2):185–190. - PubMed
-
- Tok D, Kadife I, Turak O, Ozcan F, Basar N, Cagli K, et al. Increased epicardial fat thickness is associated with low grade systemic inflammation in metabolic syndrome. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2012;40(8):690–695. - PubMed
-
- Eroglu S, Sade LE, Yildirir A, Demir Ö, Müderrisoglu H. Association of epicardial adipose tissue thickness by echocardiography and hypertension. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2013;41(2):115–122. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
