Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Feb;22(2):105-19.
doi: 10.1017/S1355617716000060.

Modern Methods for Interrogating the Human Connectome

Affiliations
Review

Modern Methods for Interrogating the Human Connectome

Mark J Lowe et al. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: Connectionist theories of brain function took hold with the seminal contributions of Norman Geschwind a half century ago. Modern neuroimaging techniques have expanded the scientific interest in the study of brain connectivity to include the intact as well as disordered brain.

Methods: In this review, we describe the most common techniques used to measure functional and structural connectivity, including resting state functional MRI, diffusion MRI, and electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography coherence. We also review the most common analytical approaches used for examining brain interconnectivity associated with these various imaging methods.

Results: This review presents a critical analysis of the assumptions, as well as methodological limitations, of each imaging and analysis approach.

Conclusions: The overall goal of this review is to provide the reader with an introduction to evaluating the scientific methods underlying investigations that probe the human connectome.

Keywords: Complex network analysis; Diffusion MRI; EEG/MEG coherence; Human connectome; Independent components analysis; Resting state fMRI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

The authors do not report conflicts of interest related to this manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
a) Bilateral finger tapping task activation student’s t-score, thresholded, and overlaid on BOLD-weighted EPI, the black box indicates the maximum activated region, b) mean timeseries of the black box region in (a) superposed on the task timing (high regions are periods of finger tapping), c) whole-brain false color map overlaid on high resolution anatomy (overlay indicates regions of high correlation to the region defined by the black box), and d) timeseries of spontaneous BOLD fluctuations in the boxed region.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Examples of within and among network connectivity information. The left panel shows brain regions parcellated from resting fMRI data using group ICA and the right panel shows the functional network connectivity matrix among these regions (cross-correlation).

References

    1. Abou-Elseoud A, Starck T, Remes J, Nikkinen J, Tervonen O, Kiviniemi V. The effect of model order selection in group PICA. Human Brain Mapping. 2010;31:1207–1216. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Achard S, Salvador R, Whitcher B, Suckling J, Bullmore E. A Resilient, Low-Frequency, Small-World Human Brain Functional Network with Highly Connected Association Cortical Hubs. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2006;26(1):63–72. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alexander-Bloch A, Giedd JN, Bullmore E. Imaging structural co-variance between human brain regions. [Review] Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2013;14(5):322–336. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allen EA, Damaraju E, Plis SM, Erhardt EB, Eichele T, Calhoun VD. Tracking Whole-Brain Connectivity Dynamics in the Resting State. Cerebral Cortex. 2014;24(3):663–676. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allen EA, Erhardt EB, Damaraju E, Gruner W, Segall JM, Silva RF, et al. A baseline for the multivariate comparison of resting-state networks. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. 2011;5:2. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources