Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep;18(9):876-81.
doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.194. Epub 2016 Feb 18.

Recontact in clinical practice: a survey of clinical genetics services in the United Kingdom

Daniele Carrieri  1 , Anneke M Lucassen  2 , Angus J Clarke  3 , Sandi Dheensa  2 , Shane Doheny  3 , Peter D Turnpenny  4 , Susan E Kelly  1
Affiliations

Recontact in clinical practice: a survey of clinical genetics services in the United Kingdom

Daniele Carrieri et al. Genet Med. 2016 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: To ascertain whether and how recontacting occurs in the United Kingdom.

Method: A Web-based survey was administered online between October 2014 and July 2015. A link to the survey was circulated via an e-mail invitation to the clinical leads of the United Kingdom's 23 clinical genetics services, with follow-up with senior clinical genetics staff.

Results: The majority of UK services reported that they recontact patients and their family members. However, recontacting generally occurs in an ad hoc fashion when an unplanned event causes clinicians to review a file (a "trigger"). There are no standardized recontacting practices in the United Kingdom. More than half of the services were unsure whether formalized recontacting systems should be implemented. Some suggested greater patient involvement in the process of recontacting.

Conclusion: This research suggests that a thorough evaluation of the efficacy and sustainability of potential recontacting systems within the National Health Service would be necessary before deciding whether and how to implement such a service or to create guidelines on best-practice models.Genet Med 18 9, 876-881.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Hunter, AGW, Sharpe NF, Mullen M, Meschino WS. Ethical, legal, and practical concerns about recontacting patients to inform them of new information: the case in medical genetics. In: Sharpe NF, Carter RF (eds). Genetic Testing: Care, Consent, and Liability. Wiley: Hoboken, NJ,2006. - PubMed
    1. Burton H, Cole T and Fardon P. Genomics in medicine. delivering genomics through clinical practice. In: Report of the Joint Committee on Medical Genetics. 2012. http://www.geneticseducation.nhs.uk/downloads/1386_Genomics_in_Medicine_....
    1. Pyeritz RE. The coming explosion in genetic testing–is there a duty to recontact? N Engl J Med 2011;365:1367–1369. - PubMed
    1. Rantanen E, Hietala M, Kristoffersson U, et al. Regulations and practices of genetic counselling in 38 European countries: the perspective of national representatives. Eur J Hum Genet 2008;16:1208–1216. - PubMed
    1. Hirschhorn K, Fleisher LD, Godmilow L, et al. Duty to re-contact. Policy statement by the Social, Ethical, and Legal Issues Committee of the American College of Medical Geneticists. Genet Med 1999;1:171–172. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources