Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 Feb 18;11(2):e0145958.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145958. eCollection 2016.

Impact of Aldosterone Antagonists on Sudden Cardiac Death Prevention in Heart Failure and Post-Myocardial Infarction Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Impact of Aldosterone Antagonists on Sudden Cardiac Death Prevention in Heart Failure and Post-Myocardial Infarction Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Hai-Ha Le et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background and objectives: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a severe burden of modern medicine. Aldosterone antagonist is publicized as effective in reducing mortality in patients with heart failure (HF) or post myocardial infarction (MI). Our study aimed to assess the efficacy of AAs on mortality including SCD, hospitalization admission and several common adverse effects.

Methods: We searched Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane library and clinicaltrial.gov for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assigning AAs in patients with HF or post MI through May 2015. The comparator included standard medication or placebo, or both. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Event rates were compared using a random effects model. Prospective RCTs of AAs with durations of at least 8 weeks were selected if they included at least one of the following outcomes: SCD, all-cause/cardiovascular mortality, all-cause/cardiovascular hospitalization and common side effects (hyperkalemia, renal function degradation and gynecomastia).

Results: Data from 19,333 patients enrolled in 25 trials were included. In patients with HF, this treatment significantly reduced the risk of SCD by 19% (RR 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67-0.98; p = 0.03); all-cause mortality by 19% (RR 0.81; 95% CI, 0.74-0.88, p<0.00001) and cardiovascular death by 21% (RR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70-0.89, p<0.00001). In patients with post-MI, the matching reduced risks were 20% (RR 0.80; 95% CI, 0.66-0.98; p = 0.03), 15% (RR 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76-0.95, p = 0.003) and 17% (RR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.94, p = 0.003), respectively. Concerning both subgroups, the relative risks respectively decreased by 19% (RR 0.81; 95% CI, 0.71-0.92; p = 0.002) for SCD, 18% (RR 0.82; 95% CI, 0.77-0.88, p < 0.0001) for all-cause mortality and 20% (RR 0.80; 95% CI, 0.74-0.87, p < 0.0001) for cardiovascular mortality in patients treated with AAs. As well, hospitalizations were significantly reduced, while common adverse effects were significantly increased.

Conclusion: Aldosterone antagonists appear to be effective in reducing SCD and other mortality events, compared with placebo or standard medication in patients with HF and/or after a MI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Study flowchart for the selection process of the final included trials.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Efficacy of aldosterone antagonist compared with control for the prevention of (A) Sudden death, (B) All-cause mortality, and (C) Cardiovascular death in patients with heart failure or myocardial infarction.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Efficacy of aldosterone antagonist compared to control for the prevention of (A) All-cause hospitalization and (B) Cardiovascular hospitalization in patients with heart failure or myocardial infarction.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Incidences of adverse effects (hyperkalemia, degradation of renal function and gynecomastia) under aldosterone antagonist treatment, compared with control/placebo group, in patients with heart failure or myocardial infarction.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Funnel plot of standard error (log odds ratio) by odds ratio to evaluate publication bias for effect of aldosterone antagonist treatment in preventing (A) Sudden death, (B) All-cause mortality, and (C) Cardiovascular mortality in patients with heart failure or myocardial infarction.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Funnel plot of standard error (log odds ratio) by odds ratio to evaluate publication bias for effect of aldosterone antagonist treatment in preventing (A) All-cause hospitalization and (B) Cardiovascular hospitalization in patients with heart failure or myocardial infarction.
Fig 7
Fig 7. Funnel plot of standard error (log odds ratio) by odds ratio to evaluate publication bias for effect of aldosterone antagonist treatment in inducing common side effects (hyperkalemia, degradation of renal function, gynecomastia) in comparison with placebo/control, in patients with heart failure or myocardial infarction.

References

    1. Englestein E, Douglas Z. Sudden Cardiac Death, In: Alexander RWS, Schlant RC, Fuster V, The Heart, Arteries and Veins. (New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; ); 1998.
    1. Myerburg R, Castellanos A. Cardiac Arrest and Sudden Death, In: Braunwald E, Ed. Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine., 9th edn Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1997.
    1. Mehta D, Curwin J, Gomes JA, Fuster V. Sudden Death in Coronary Artery Disease Acute Ischemia Versus Myocardial Substrate. Circulation. 1997;96: 3215–3223. 10.1161/01.CIR.96.9.3215 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Atlas SA. The renin-angiotensin aldosterone system: pathophysiological role and pharmacologic inhibition. J Manag Care Pharm JMCP. 2007;13: 9–20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nappi JM, Sieg A. Aldosterone and aldosterone receptor antagonists in patients with chronic heart failure. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2011;7: 353–363. 10.2147/VHRM.S13779 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances