Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015;102(3):501-514.
doi: 10.1093/biomet/asv028. Epub 2015 Jul 15.

Tree-based methods for individualized treatment regimes

Affiliations

Tree-based methods for individualized treatment regimes

E B Laber et al. Biometrika. 2015.

Abstract

Individualized treatment rules recommend treatments on the basis of individual patient characteristics. A high-quality treatment rule can produce better patient outcomes, lower costs and less treatment burden. If a treatment rule learned from data is to be used to inform clinical practice or provide scientific insight, it is crucial that it be interpretable; clinicians may be unwilling to implement models they do not understand, and black-box models may not be useful for guiding future research. The canonical example of an interpretable prediction model is a decision tree. We propose a method for estimating an optimal individualized treatment rule within the class of rules that are representable as decision trees. The class of rules we consider is interpretable but expressive. A novel feature of this problem is that the learning task is unsupervised, as the optimal treatment for each patient is unknown and must be estimated. The proposed method applies to both categorical and continuous treatments and produces favourable marginal mean outcomes in simulation experiments. We illustrate it using data from a study of major depressive disorder.

Keywords: Continuous treatment; Exploratory analysis; Personalized medicine; Treatment regime; Tree-based method.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A decision rule composed of rectangles r1 = {(1, 1, 1)} and r2 = {(2,−3,−1)} with rectangular regions 0=r1cr2 and 1=(r1cr2)r1.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Heatmaps of true and estimated optimal treatment rules: (a) average treatment assignment as a function of x1 and x2 over 25 learned decision rules for (7), with p = 25 and n = 250; (b) optimal treatment assignment as a function of x1 and x2 for (7); optimal treatment assignment for (7) depends exclusively on x1 and x2.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Learned decision rule for nafazodone study: patients with high mood disturbance (MOOD), poor sleep (SLEEPD2), or more severe depression symptoms (HAMD) are assigned nefazodone and cognitive behavioural therapy (Drug + CBT); others are assigned nefazodone only.

References

    1. Allegra CJ, Jessup JM, Somerfield MR, Hamilton SR, Hammond EH, Hayes DF, McAllister PK, Morton RF, Schilsky RL. American society of clinical oncology provisional clinical opinion: Testing for KRAS gene mutations in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma to predict response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody therapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 2009;27:2091–2096. - PubMed
    1. Breiman L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 2001;45:5–32.
    1. Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ. Classification and Regression Trees. Monterey, California: Wadsworth and Brooks; 1984.
    1. Brinkley J, Tsiatis A, Anstrom KJ. A generalized estimator of the attributable benefit of an optimal treatment regime. Biometrics. 2010;66:512–522. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carroll RJ, Ruppert D. Transformation and Weighting in Regression. New York: Chapman and Hall; 1988.