Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Feb;71(2):114-25.
doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000274.

Obesity and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: Battling the Bulge

Affiliations
Review

Obesity and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: Battling the Bulge

Shireen de Sam Lazaro et al. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Importance: Pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) comprise a broad spectrum of clinical conditions, including urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, fecal incontinence, and defecatory dysfunction. These disorders are common conditions that generate significant medical, emotional, social, and economic issues for many women. Obese women are disproportionately affected compared with their normal-weight peers, with more than half of women with a body mass index of greater than 35 kg/m(2) reporting a PFD, compared with only 32% in women with a normal body mass index. Despite this prevalence, little research is available to help guide and tailor treatment in obese populations.

Objective: This review outlines current knowledge regarding the relative contribution of obesity to PFDs, as well as its effect on treatment implications.

Evidence acquisition: Literature relating to the incidence and treatment of PFDs in obese populations was reviewed.

Results: Both nonsurgical and surgical weight loss improves all PFDs. Obese women benefit from pelvic floor training, biofeedback, and pharmacologic treatments of urinary and fecal incontinence. Surgical treatments of stress urinary incontinence note increased operative times and perhaps slightly lower cure rates, but overall good treatment success in obese women. No increased risks of complications or treatment failure were noted in obese women treated for prolapse surgically, and pessaries work well for both prolapse and stress urinary incontinence in obese women.

Conclusions/relevance: Although literature regarding treatment of PFDs in obese women is limited, the available evidence demonstrates good treatment outcomes in obese populations. Further research into how to best counsel and optimize treatment of obese patients is essential as the obesity epidemic continues.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources