Quantitative sensory testing in classical trigeminal neuralgia-a blinded study in patients with and without concomitant persistent pain
- PMID: 26894914
- DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000528
Quantitative sensory testing in classical trigeminal neuralgia-a blinded study in patients with and without concomitant persistent pain
Abstract
The diagnostic criteria of the third International Classification of Headache Disorders state that there should be no neurological deficits in patients with classical trigeminal neuralgia (TN) at clinical examination. However, studies demonstrating sensory abnormalities at bedside examination in TN patients have questioned this. Our aim was to examine whether TN patients without sensory abnormalities at neurological examination have sensory abnormalities at quantitative sensory testing (QST) and whether there were any QST differences between TN with and without concomitant persistent pain. Thirty-six TN patients were investigated with the standardized QST protocol by the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain. The investigators were blinded to presence of concomitant persistent pain and symptomatic side. Based on comparison to the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain controls, z scores were calculated to process frequency analyses and Z-profiles. We found increased mechanical detection threshold on the symptomatic side (47.2% vs 0%, P = 0.008), asymptomatic side (33.3% vs 0%, P = 0.011), and hand (36% vs 0%, P < 0.001) in TN compared with controls. The Z-profiles demonstrated increased mechanical detection threshold on the symptomatic side compared with the asymptomatic side (-2.980 vs -2.166, P = 0.040). Thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia was detected bilaterally in the face and the hand. Trigeminal neuralgia patients with concomitant persistent pain tended to have higher mean z score values compared to TN with purely paroxysmal pain indicative of decreased detection thresholds. Trigeminal neuralgia patients with no sensory abnormalities at neurological examination had generalized subclinical hypoesthesia, which was more pronounced on the symptomatic side, and thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia. This could indicate pain-induced hypoesthesia and sensitization induced by central mechanisms.
Comment in
-
Widespread effects of clinically unilateral focal nerve injuries.Pain. 2017 Jun;158(6):1175-1176. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000867. Pain. 2017. PMID: 28514253 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Barker FG, Jannetta PJ, Bissonette DJ, Larkins MV, Jho HD. The long-term outcome of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. N Engl J Med 1996;223:1077–83.
-
- Le Bars D. The whole body receptive field of dorsal horn multireceptive neurones. Brain Res Rev 2002;40:29–44.
-
- Benoliel R, Zadik Y, Eliav E, Sharav Y. Peripheral painful traumatic trigeminal neuropathy: clinical features in 91 cases and proposal of novel diagnostic criteria. J Orofac Pain 2012;26:49–58.
-
- Blatow M, Nennig E, Sarpaczki E, Reinhardt J, Schlieter M, Herweh C, Rasche D, Tronnier VM, Sartor K, Stippich C. Altered somatosensory processing in trigeminal neuralgia. Hum Brain Mapp 2009;30:3495–508.
-
- Bowsher D, Miles JB, Haggett CE, Eldridge PR. Trigeminal neuralgia: a quantitative sensory perception threshold study in patients who had not undergone previous invasive procedures. J Neurosurg 1997;86:190–2.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
