Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct;60(4):282-288.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Feb 17.

Load distribution on abutment tooth, implant and residual ridge with distal-extension implant-supported removable partial denture

Affiliations

Load distribution on abutment tooth, implant and residual ridge with distal-extension implant-supported removable partial denture

Yoshiki Matsudate et al. J Prosthodont Res. 2016 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of implant location on load distribution in the abutment tooth, implant and residual ridge with a distal-extension implant-supported removable partial denture (ISRPD).

Methods: A mandibular unilateral distal-extension edentulous simulation model was used. Implants were inserted at the second premolar (mesial implant) and second molar (distal implant) positions in the edentulous area. An experimental ISRPD was fabricated of acrylic resin with a cobalt-chromium alloy framework. Loads on the implants and abutment tooth were measured with piezoelectric force transducers. The load on the residual ridge was measured with pressure-sensitive film. A vertical load of 100N was applied at the first molar region. Measurements were made under the following three conditions: with conventional removable partial denture (CRPD), with mesial-implant-supported removable partial denture (MISRPD), and with distal-implant-supported removable partial denture (DISRPD). In each condition, the unused implants were made inactive by eliminating contact with the inner surface of the denture.

Results: The load on the abutment tooth was greatest with DISRPD, followed by CRPD and MISRPD (P<0.01). The load on the implant was greater with DISRPD than with MISRPD (P<0.01). The load on the residual ridge was lowest with DISRPD, followed by MISRPD and CRPD (P<0.01).

Conclusions: This experimental study provided quantitative data regarding the effect of implant location on load distribution with ISRPDs. Further investigation regarding the effect of denture design on the load distribution is needed for determining the proper implant location of ISRPD.

Keywords: Dental implant; Implant-supported removable partial denture; Load; Removable partial denture; Transducers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Substances

LinkOut - more resources