Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jan-Feb;68(1):99-101.
doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2015.06.038. Epub 2016 Jan 18.

Transcatheter closure of post-myocardial infarction ventricular defect: Where are we?

Affiliations
Review

Transcatheter closure of post-myocardial infarction ventricular defect: Where are we?

Ramachandra Barik. Indian Heart J. 2016 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Since 1988, TCC of PMIVSD became an alternative treatment for anatomically suitable patients with high risk of surgical closure. TCC is less invasive but the optimal timing and technique have not developed much in the last four decades. The dismal prognosis at the contemporary sight should not be discouraged. The rapid innovation in TAVI is an example. The learning curve slopes down to the line of inertia in inaction. Some innovations have slept for centuries but their potential needs to be celebrated. The published experience of TCC of PMIVSD across the globe is limited as they are based on consensus. The experience related to clinical practice has heterogeneous topography around the globe because of the morbid pathology. The increasing number of onsite cardiothoracic wings, better imaging tools, LVADS, and ECMO, along with improvement in well matching hardware to the pathology of PMIVSD, build incremental confidence. The improved outcomes believes in the enthusiasm of closing the PMIVSD using either surgical or TCC approach and is recommended.

Keywords: Challenges; Post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal defect; Transcatheter closure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arnaoutakis G.J., Zhao Y., George T.J. Surgical repair of ventricular septal defect after myocardial infarction: outcomes from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94:436–444. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cicekcioglu F., Tutun U., Parlar A.I. Residual postmyocardial infarction ventricular septal defect repair through right atrium with right thoracotomy on beating heart technique. J Card Sur. 2008;23:580–583. - PubMed
    1. De Puy F.G. Outcomes of percutaneous repair of post-infarction ventricular septal rupture in acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65
    1. Attia R., Blauth C. Which patients might be suitable for a septal occluder device closure of postinfarction ventricular septal rupture rather than immediate surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;11:626–629. - PubMed
    1. Egbe A.C., Poterucha J.T., Rihal C.S. Transcatheter closure of postmyocardial infarction, iatrogenic, and postoperative ventricular septal defects: the Mayo Clinic experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;1 [Epub ahead of print] - PubMed

Further reading

    1. French J.K., Hellkamp A.S., Armstrong P.W. Mechanical complications after percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (from APEX-AMI) Am J Cardiol. 2010;105:59–63. - PubMed

MeSH terms