Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug:149:266-273.
doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.02.013. Epub 2016 Feb 16.

Bioaccessibility and bioavailability of methylmercury from seafood commonly consumed in North America: In vitro and epidemiological studies

Affiliations

Bioaccessibility and bioavailability of methylmercury from seafood commonly consumed in North America: In vitro and epidemiological studies

Maia Siedlikowski et al. Environ Res. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

Methylmercury (MeHg) is a global contaminant of concern and human exposures are largely realized via seafood consumption. While it is assumed that 95-100% of the ingested MeHg from seafood reaches systemic circulation, recent in vitro studies have yielded results to suggest otherwise. Of the published studies to have characterized the bioaccessibility or bioavailability of MeHg from seafood, only a handful of seafood species have been characterized, there exists tremendous variability in data within and across species, few species of relevance to North America have been studied, and none of the in vitro studies have adapted results to an epidemiology study. The objective of the current study was two-fold: (a) to characterize in vitro MeHg bioaccessibility and bioavailability from ten commonly consumed types of seafood in North America; and (b) to apply the bioaccessibility and bioavailability data from the in vitro study to an existing human MeHg exposure assessment study. Raw seafood samples (cod, crab, halibut, salmon, scallop, shrimp, tilapia, and three tuna types: canned light, canned white, fresh) were purchased in Montreal and their MeHg concentrations generally overlapped with values reported elsewhere. The bioaccessibility of MeHg from these samples ranged from 50.1±19.2 (canned white tuna) to 100% (shrimp and scallop) of the amount measured in the raw undigested sample. The bioavailability of MeHg from these samples ranged from 29.3±10.4 (crab) to 67.4±9.7% (salmon) of the value measured in the raw undigested sample. There were significant correlations between the initial MeHg concentration in seafood with the percent of that Hg that was bioaccessible (r=-0.476) and bioavailable (r=-0.294). When the in vitro data were applied to an existing MeHg exposure assessment study, the estimated amount of MeHg absorbed into systemic circulation decreased by 25% and 42% when considering bioaccessibility and bioavailability, respectively. When the in vitro data were integrated into a regression model relating dietary MeHg intake from seafood with hair and blood Hg biomarkers, there were no differences in key model parameters when comparing the default model (that assumes 100% bioavailability) with models adjusted for the in vitro bioaccessibility and bioavailability data. In conclusion this work adds to a growing number of studies that together suggest that MeHg bioavailability from seafood may be less than 100%, but also documents the challenges when integrating such in vitro data into human exposure and risk assessments.

Keywords: Bioavailability; Biological availability; Caco-2 cells; Diet; Fish; Hg; Mercury; Risk assessment; Shellfish.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No conflict of interest is declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Bioaccessibility and bioavailability of methylmercury as a percentage of methylmercury concentration measured in the initial (raw, pre-digested) seafood muscle. Percentage data are reported as mean ± SD (n=6/type of seafood).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Methylmercury concentration (ng/g wet weight) in the initial (raw, pre-digested) seafood muscle compared with the percent of that mercury that was bioaccessible (A) and bioavailable (B). For both axes mean data for each seafood are reported as points (n=6/type of seafood).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aberg B, Ekman L, Falk R, Greitz U, Persson G, Snihs JO. Metabolism of methyl mercury compounds in man: excretion and distribution. Archives of Environmental Health - An International Journal. 1969;19:478–484. - PubMed
    1. Afonso C, Costa S, Cardoso C, Oliveira R, Lourenço H, Viula A, et al. Nunes M. Benefits and risks associated with consumption of raw, cooked, and canned tuna (Thunnus spp.) based on the bioaccessibility of seleniuand methylmercury. Environ Res 2015 - PubMed
    1. Basu N, Tutino R, Zhang Z, Cantonwine D, Goodrich J, Somers E, Rodriguez L, Schnaas L, Solano M, Mercado A, Peterson K, Sanchez B, Hernández-Avila M, Hu H, Tellez-Rojo M. Mercury Levels in Pregnant Women, Children, and Seafood from Mexico City. Environmental Research. 2014;135:63–69. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berntssen MH, Hylland K, Lundebye AK, Julshamn K. Higher faecal excretion and lower tissue accumulation of mercury in Wistar rats from contaminated fish than from methylmercury chloride added to fish. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2004;42:1359–1366. - PubMed
    1. Cabanero AI, Madrid Y, Camara C. Selenium and mercury bioaccessibility in fish samples: an in vitro digestion method. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2004;526:51–61.

Publication types

Substances