Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Feb 20:16:71.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1321-x.

The preventive services use self-efficacy (PRESS) scale in older women: development and psychometric properties

Mini E Jacob  1 , Wei-Hsuan Lo-Ciganic  2 , Laurey R Simkin-Silverman  3 , Steven M Albert  4 , Anne B Newman  5 , Lauren Terhorst  6 , Joni Vander Bilt  7 , Janice C Zgibor  8 , Elizabeth A Schlenk  9
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The preventive services use self-efficacy (PRESS) scale in older women: development and psychometric properties

Mini E Jacob et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Preventive services offered to older Americans are currently under-utilized despite considerable evidence regarding their health and economic benefits. Individuals with low self-efficacy in accessing these services need to be identified and provided self-efficacy enhancing interventions. Scales measuring self-efficacy in the management of chronic diseases exist, but do not cover the broad spectrum of preventive services and behaviors that can improve the health of older adults, particularly older women who are vulnerable to poorer health and lesser utilization of preventive services. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of a new preventive services use self-efficacy scale, by measuring its internal consistency reliability, assessing internal construct validity by exploring factor structure, and examining differences in self-efficacy scores according to participant characteristics.

Methods: The Preventive Services Use Self-Efficacy (PRESS) Scale was developed by an expert panel at the University of Pittsburgh Center for Aging and Population Health - Prevention Research Center. It was administered to 242 women participating in an ongoing trial and the data were analyzed to assess its psychometric properties. An exploratory factor analysis with a principal axis factoring approach and orthogonal varimax rotation was used to explore the underlying structure of the items in the scale. The internal consistency of the subscales was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient.

Results: The exploratory factor analysis defined five self-efficacy factors (self-efficacy for exercise, communication with physicians, self-management of chronic disease, obtaining screening tests, and getting vaccinations regularly) formed by 16 items from the scale. The internal consistency of the subscales ranged from .81 to .94. Participants who accessed a preventive service had higher self-efficacy scores in the corresponding sub-scale than those who did not.

Conclusions: The 16-item PRESS scale demonstrates preliminary validity and reliability in measuring self-efficacy in the use of preventive services among older women. It can potentially be used to evaluate the impact of interventions designed to improve self-efficacy in the use of preventive services in community-dwelling older women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Scree plot of the exploratory factor analysis of the PRESS scale
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention AoA, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and, Services CfMaM. Enhancing Use of Clinical Preventive Services Among Older Adults. 2011.
    1. Farley TA, Dalal MA, Mostashari F, Frieden TR. Deaths preventable in the U.S. by improvements in use of clinical preventive services. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38(6):600–9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.02.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maciosek MV, Coffield AB, Flottemesch TJ, Edwards NM, Solberg LI. Greater use of preventive services in U.S. health care could save lives at little or no cost. Health Aff. 2010;29(9):1656–60. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2008.0701. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cameron KA, Song J, Manheim LM, Dunlop DD. Gender disparities in health and healthcare use among older adults. J Women’s Health (2002) 2010;19(9):1643–50. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2009.1701. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Frieden TR. A framework for public health action: the health impact pyramid. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(4):590–5. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.185652. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types